# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-867497:0009
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-867497:0009?run=79
# Title: LBr. 934 · Tolomei
# Folio 5r, page id DE-611-HS-867497:0009
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 6v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=DE-611-HS-867497&page=9
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/DE-611-HS-867497/jpgs/default/00000009.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 79, 2026-09-07T03:33:42Z — 45 lines, status machine
# Lines: 45 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Reverendissimo patu ptoremae.
coc. Pesu Theologo
hodefridus quildeluas Leibnitius S. P. d.
Ex quo mihi Tecum Rormae colloqui datum fuit
ardens
magni feci et doctrinam tuam eet judicium acre, et sidium beritatis
quo mihi ver per quibus subsidie veram phito sophia
emendatiorem a TE in scholas introduci posse judicuum,
Ex eo audivi prodiissse ingens opus Tuum titulo philosophiae
insimae
intellex e
mentis et sensus. Sed nondum ad meas manus devenit,
etsi quidam Bibliopbla umbis polliceretur. Aunus ost
autem et quod excurrit, quod Du. Baro De Reuschen-
bem, Metropolitanae Trevirensis et Cathedralis Hildescensis
duo
Ecclesae
Canoniens nescio quo amico petente a me
petente de sententiis meis philosophicis quae sivit. Quare
aliqua in schedam conjeci, quae aq ad CE pervenerint
Itaque cum nunc Auticus amicus
non intellexi.
Hetruseus, Auticas Seremissimi Electoris Bruusuicensis
litera
in Romam petat, has eiad TE dare volui.
Mea quidem sententia est, omnia in naturae firi
Corporeae phoenomena explicari fieri p mechanices
ipsa tamen principia Mechanismi ex altiore fonte
oriri, et cum Aristotele. Entelechias primitivas id est
Animas aut substantias impartibiles animatit  analogas 
non minus cres pereunes quam credebantur
vitales
ubique in materia esse agniscendas, quoriam viros dorivativae Alomi demotuticorum
Quod non uno argumento demonstrativo compar
negand
tum quod vires denvativas um sint motifica variabiles oportet
Cin corporibusst
etse modificationes principii activi constantis, tum quod
alioqui posita plenitudine et divisibilitate materiae, sine entelechiis
nulla esset phaenomenorum diversitas, tum aliis etiam ex natura
monadum argumentis. Porro deprechendi vires derivations
tame
etsi variant in eodem corpore, in tota autem materia aut etiam
partibis ejus quae solae inter se communicare ponuntur, eadem
quantitate manere; xsum autem esse quod endem