# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-867908:0081
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-867908:0081?run=74
# Title: LBr. 171 · Conring
# Folio 41r, page id DE-611-HS-867908:0081
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 42v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=DE-611-HS-867908&page=81
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/DE-611-HS-867908/jpgs/default/00000081.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 34 lines, status machine
# Lines: 34 recognised, mean confidence 0.98
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

sine
Am
ne
viteras tuas accepi, semper optatas modo tibi tam
eas scribere per valedlulinem ac negotia commodum quam
mihi legere gratum esset. Maximam in paucis verbis rerum
vim pressisti. Conabor tamen respondere etiam paucis quantim
res patietur. Stenonium Episcopum doleo nunc a physioloqu
cis studiis averti ad theologica vel ideo guia inhis facilius
quam in illis habebit parem. Si quando ad Batazium scribere
ubebit literas tuas curabo diligenter. Capucinica scripta qualia
hic certe prodeunt vix tanti habentur ut quaerat quispiam quo
sint loco et quousq provecta. Quoeram tamen ab ipso steno
nio data occasiorie: in quo styli modestiam recte laudas.
Sitiopolin comperi esse urbem Hauriae sedem olim Episcopalem
Archiepiscopo Seleutiae subditam ita habet in lexico Geogra
phico Ferrarius ex actis opinor Conciliorum, qui addit et
Sitopolin appellari. Slenonius sese Episcopum ditiopolitanum
et Vicarium Apostolicum appellat. Quid de Capucinica controversia
sentiat aliquando ex eo quaeram. Respirationis usum, et quo
modo tam sit necessaria ad vitam nondum fatis explicatum
puto respirationem esse caujam motus corclis nemo dicet qui
vivorum animalium anatoniam attente viderit. Etiamsi vero con
ob calorem saliat, quemadmodo experimento constat non tamen
apparet unde calor in animati, et quomodo conservetur atque agat
Nam calorem a motu sanquinis atque cordis rursus derivare esset
circulum committere. Videtur ergo res recltura ad quandam fermet
tationem sive reactionem atque conflictum quem quidam oriri
putant ex permistione sanquinis veteris et chyli novi. de qu
sententiam tuam desideraveram potius quam de quaestione
an motus cordis sit a respiratione, quam non moveram
quanquam illud quaerendum restet an aer in pulmonibus alii
quid sanguini conferat an vero tantum calorem alat, quem admodum
furni chymici respiraculo incligent.