# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-958680:0040
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-958680:0040?run=74
# Title: LBr. 95 · DesBosses
# Folio 20v, page id DE-611-HS-958680:0040
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 21r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=DE-611-HS-958680&page=40
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/DE-611-HS-958680/jpgs/default/00000040.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 31 lines, status machine
# Lines: 31 recognised, mean confidence 0.95
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

In tua ad Vyoly librum disserratione praeliminari notoquae sparsas hunc inde
definitiones reperi, quae mili salivam moverunt, caeterasque quas a le confectas
arebas, videndi desderium exectarant. Pace tua, vir Illustrisseme parum
abest quin crascar histoniae asti tua, quae profundiorbus scientiis ad quras
illustrandas natus et, te subdivit, magna cum jactura boni publui, imo
si ausim dicere, gloria tue. nam si de gloriu agitur, cedo milui prestan
tissimum, quem voles, Tujus aevi histonicum, cujus cum laude Castesuus
philos optiicam suam famam permutare vellet s vireret. Scis alios aliter
assectas esse, sed et scio plurimos sentire mecum.
A nupero colloquio nostro duae in mentem venere dubitationes quas hic
Subnecto, tuque pr tua humamtate boui consules.
X. Admissis diverse nuture enteleclis, quid opus est cognitione un brutis? au nou
diversitas motuum, quam in illis cernimus, un diversas, sed perceptionis expestes
eatclechias refundi poterit ad eum fere morum quo motus humani corpoiy
negas pendere ab influxu animae saltem ut percestion est..
2. Cum caeteris parebus diversus corpous motus prodite non possit nisi a
divessa entelechia, sequi videtur, Tegem illam quam 8. Daulus iebat
in membris suis, repugnantem Cegi mentis suu, et captivantem se in lege
peccati quae erat in membris ejus, hanc unquam legem, imo ipsum peccatum
originale, quod vel haec ipsa len est, uti a multus protestantibus assentur
vel sujus legis radix est, esse entelechiam quandanr, adeoque sabstachiais
vel sabstantialem uti fllaccus Ellipiais asserebat. Pane motus illi
concupiscentra, inio nec concupisentia ipsa mordinata futura non erat
in patura integra. Quid quod, cum anima ita corpori attemperata sit
ut cuilibet motui corporis faltem a nobis perceptibili alius in amna
respondent non liber, scet ut amnien hominis labe origmali inquinandi
et lege peccati quae est in membus nostus eaptivandi, aliam omnino esse
ab ca necesse sit quae in statu naturae integne creanda fuisset. adeoque
neminem ommum oue nune ercantur creandum fcusse, imo nec recli
potuisse si adam non peccasset. imo nec Adamum fortasse potrusse condi
euudem si peccaturus non fuecat.