# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-958680:0087
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-958680:0087?run=74
# Title: LBr. 95 · DesBosses
# Folio 44r, page id DE-611-HS-958680:0087
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 43v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=DE-611-HS-958680&page=87
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/DE-611-HS-958680/jpgs/default/00000087.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 28 lines, status machine
# Lines: 28 recognised, mean confidence 0.96
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Taro ut unum accipias.
Prodyt etiam in lucem: Panoplia Gratiae sub nonune P. thoma Lemos ordinis
Draedicatorum, liber impressui annis 52 post moctem thomae Lemos. at R B. Krippem-
berus deminicarus, et doctor Theologie facultatis Coloniensii Scuipto impresso protesta-
tus est supposititium esse partum, non compositum a Datu Lemos, sed continentem
errous tansenii.
Alcus item Liber recenter excusus est: De mente Conculy Tnidentini circa gratiam
etficacem Aathore fratue Reginaldo Dominicano, illo ipso, cui P. Turcus domiini
eanorum Generalis scribitur dixisse: Si ostenderot 8. Thomam denuisse praedeter
minationem physicam, fore ut praeter morem sue provinuae renunuaret magiller
quam Historiam autor in piologo dicit esse falsissimam.
Cum alias significares non ingratum forc si quae ad sententias tuas confirman-
idon.
das occurrunt ea tibi indicarem. non possum quin exhibeam tibi verba paucala
sntonii Derez nostri, Theologi, Si quis alius, acuti, excerpta e tractatu de viotutibus
Pheologicis disputatione sexla capite 3. numero 2. pagina mihu 280
Infinitam multitudinem punctorum actualium aut instar mathematicorum
in quantitate et tempore existimo esse impossibilem, etiam de potentia absoluta.
nam licet contimuum sit in infinitum ivisibile ut ego existimo, et A intipita
contineat indivisibilia metaphysica, mathematica tamen actualia non potest
continere infuuta actu, sed solum in potentia. quomodo autem differat indivrsibile
metaphysicum, et andirisibile mathematicum actucale, et indivrsibile met lematucum
potentiale alibi explicui, et in hac distinctione enistimo contistere solutionem
difficultatis continur. Hucusque Perez. Ego in indivisibilit istis metaphyscios
quae astruit, alcqua systematis tui lineamentu agnosceu mili videor
Cuperem videre, nisi molestum est, opus illu receus Clarissum Hasthoecker de
quo naper, nam ea qua in diario Parisiensi ab eo contra D: La Montre
disputata mvcici, lucem cento nounallam atesus Cactesus priacipia ductem