# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-958680:0195
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-958680:0195?run=74
# Title: LBr. 95 · DesBosses
# Folio 96r, page id DE-611-HS-958680:0195
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 95v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=DE-611-HS-958680&page=195
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/DE-611-HS-958680/jpgs/default/00000195.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 32 lines, status machine
# Lines: 32 recognised, mean confidence 0.96
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

posita quiam Cartesani statuunt plenitudne rerum et uniformitate malenae
notago solo accedente temper aequaevalentia sibi substitui, perinde ac si tantum
pota pertate uniformis circa suum anem agentur en alque ita statum
uniui momente distingui non posse, ergo na in phaecomenis varictatem
existere posse adeoque pnaeter figuram, magnitudinem et motum admit
dendas esse formes per quas diftincteo apparentiarum in materia orratur
ergo phaenomenorum varietas ab enteleclirarum varietate petenda est.
non recte
ei mentem tuam recte percipio, transercatio ammceurational in rationalem
esset substitatio animae rationalis in vicem irrationalis quae antea erat et
jam desinit atque adeo gradus essentialis ille perfectionis additus animae–
non ert facultas acidentalis sed idem realiter eum issa animae de
novo ercatae et in prious locum substitutae substantia. Suque transcae
atio miraculosa ent certe, cum afferat destructionem anima saltem prious
si non materae primitiva quacum istu mronadem consttuebat. contra
quod nihil habeo quod reporram nusi hoc unum: paradouum inultis
fortasse visum iri hominem rebus ut nonc sunt ila constitutii, non posse
fure miraculo generan.
de eatero facultatem sentrendi et ratiocinandi philosophi quidam
inte se distincerant, at que inter eos Gassendus aut certé Berneius
qui tomo E compendis Gassendiana epitomes libro 6 pag. mutri 499
caeteris opiciombus repudiatis hanc ipsam amplulitur: animam nempe
hominii ex duabus conttare partibus: attera irrationali quae vege
tativam et sensitrvam includens corporca sit, ac velute medium quoddam
aut vinculum rationalis omrimae cum corpore; altera rationali vel
intellatuali quae incorpocea sit, a deo ercate infusa et tanquam vera
forma corpori media irrationali unitu. pro qua sententia non nullos
Scholasticos adduut.
Honoratius frabui Cibro 2. de Homiine propositione A1 asserit poteri-
tiam sensitivam in homine realite distingui ab anima rationali
et libro T. propos. 11 statuit nhilominus in quolibet homine
unam duntanat essea acminam, prempe ratioenalem, quiae sclicet esse