# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-958680:0346
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-958680:0346?run=74
# Title: LBr. 95 · DesBosses
# Folio 170v, page id DE-611-HS-958680:0346
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 171r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=DE-611-HS-958680&page=346
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/DE-611-HS-958680/jpgs/default/00000346.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 48 lines, status machine
# Lines: 48 recognised, mean confidence 0.97
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

In hac etiam consideratione nulla occurrit
 extensio aut compositio continui, et
omnes de punctis difficultates evanescunt.
Huhor est quod dicere volui alicubi; mea
Theodicaea difficultates de compositione confinui
admonere nos debere, les louge aliter esse
quia necesse sit superaddi, si onams addamus Unionem subslantialem, en ponantus
conciuendas. Videndum deinde
substantiam dari corpoream  adeoque materiam,  et an
t tunc necesse sit recurri ad corpus Mathematicum
licum. ac vereram seu matlam Certe Monades
non ideo propire erunt in loco absoluto, 
cum revera non sint ingredientia sed tantum
requisita materiae. Itaque non ided necesse erit
pncra uaedant localiae indivisibilia quaedam
localia constitui quae in tantas dificultates
conjiciunt. sufficit substantiam corpoream
esse rel quoddam phaenomena extra percipdentia Animas.
realisans; sed in quo nolim concipere partes actu,
nisi quae actuali divisione fiunt; nec indivisibilia
nisi ut i extrema
Monades existere puto existentiam
semper habere plenam nec concipi posse ut 
partes potentia dicuntur esse in toto. Et et
Nec video quid Monas dominans aliarum monadum
existentie de trahat. cum revera inter eas nullum
s eis sit commercium, sed tantum consensus.
Unitas substantiae corporeat in equo non oritur
ab ulla refractione Monadum sed a Vinculo
substantiali superuddito per quod in ipsis mona.
dibus nihil prorsus imimutatur.
si definias accidens id esse quod existat
exigat in ex an existere alteri sub substantiae
vereor ut formalem rationem ojus satis explicemus,
explicesi, nam ratio apparere deberet, cur
inde
exigat. Sane omnis s substantia saepe exigit
etiam
aliam substantiam. Explicandum foret, quid proprie
sit F inelse in quo accidentis natura collocari solet, ego ad hec retulero
ux sit madificatio altertus absoluti aliem
Veraris aliquis potest elle pars corporis mei et sub mea
monade dominunt qui idem alia ani-
malcula in corpore suo habet sub sua monade
dominante, dominatio autem et sub–
ordinatio monadum in ipsis consi–
derata in ipsis monadibus non con-
sistit nisi in gradibus perfectionum