# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-958680:0355
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-958680:0355?run=74
# Title: LBr. 95 · DesBosses
# Folio 175r, page id DE-611-HS-958680:0355
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 174v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=DE-611-HS-958680&page=355
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/DE-611-HS-958680/jpgs/default/00000355.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 31 lines, status machine
# Lines: 31 recognised, mean confidence 0.95
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

dices fortasse casum esse impossibilem nam variato obicito suc termino cogut
tionis, variau perceptionem ipsam necesse est Respondeo varrato obecto
immedrato et motivo ut vocamus variari quoque debere perceptionem non
item variato objato mediato et purc terminante. perceplio autem illa
pro objecto motivo et immediato hrabet aliquud in anima non enim anima
perceptiones suas accijit ab obzato entra animam. Aaque objerta entra
animam sunt pure terminativa peceptionis
Hinc fit dum experimentali aliqua cognitione designo aliquod corpus
dicendo Hoc corpuy sive haec res non esse necesse ut pronomen demon
strativum hoc afficiat ipsam individualitatem substantiae, sed sufficere
at cadat supra individualitatem phaenomeni. nam hoc corpius idem
significat ac res substans his auidentibus qve phenomeins ubi indin
dualitas se tenet ex parte phonomencov. Unde quamdu manebib
res aliqua sive eadem froc diversa substans his phaenomenis manebit
semper haec res sive hoc
At dices necdum intelligi quare monades recens natae incissiant subesse
his phaenomenis sive perceptionibu, quid enim eas determinat ut subsint
potius quam non subsint, ut sutsint potius novae illae quam remanentus.
Respondeo quierendo quare monades quae destructie sunt phenomenis
sive perceptionibis illis habesse prius dicerentur? nunquid ob hanc aliamve
similem causam quia monadum illarum jam destructasum erustentia erat
causa saltem idcaly in mente Dei cur deis tales perceptiones animae mece
indidenit? atqui cunta tertiam suppositionem initio postulatam reccn-
des monades sunt crauter causa idcalii conservationis illarum percepto-
onum sive phaenomenorum in mente mea ergo et hue receutes jam dictii
perceptronibus subesse dicende erunt non minui quam destructie ante
suberant. cum hoc tamen discrimine quod monades destructae natusaliter
istis phaenomenis suberant, unde et ipsas sive ipsarum complenum
denominabant entensum coloratum eto at monades illae de novo adveu
entes earumve complenum non denominantuntur denominabil entensum
es