# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-973581:0066
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-973581:0066?run=312
# Title: LBr. 396 · Hermann
# Folio 33v, page id DE-611-HS-973581:0066
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 34r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=DE-611-HS-973581&page=66
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/DE-611-HS-973581/jpgs/default/00000066.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 312, 2026-09-10T21:55:22Z — 33 lines, status machine
# Lines: 33 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

quem sensum mihi quoque scribit Celeberr. Guylielminus in humaniss. Suii
ad me literis, quanquum spem huc faciat, fore ut totum negotium proxi-
ma studiorum renovatione sit terminandum.
Claris. Fardella mihi non dixit, quimam ille Monachus Benedictinus
ehet Profesionem Patuinam ambicus, adeo ut dicere non posiim, an sit
P. Quido Grandus cujus lommentarium in Vivianea Problenata vidi satii
amplum in quo methodo tantum indivisibilium Cavalleriana ut eb atur, alter
autem ejus tractatus de Logarithmiu in Aetir nupere recensitus ad ma
nus nostras nondum pervenit; verum ex Acti vidimus. Cel. Bernoulluu et ego
eum Grandii librum novitate materia non esse multum commendabilem cum
Sila Theoremata circa Logarithmicum magno appuratu demonstret qui Huge
nius Tractatui ile Cause grovitatis attexuit, et qua critus sere lineu calculi
differentialis benesicio quam facillime expedivi potuissent, ut in responsioe
mea ad D. Nieumentiitii Considerationes jum antehue monueran.
3
Vidirti, 14 Consultissime, ex nupero Mense Actorum me non purum a ll.
aerum
de la Hire dissentire circu Curvaturam Rudii visivi per maduum difformiter
densum transcuntir quam Cycloidem esse dicit in Commentarir A cadenuu
Parisiensir et ego Currum esse demonstro in infinitum abeuntem et argni
ptota praditum. Errorem inde poofluxise puto, quod Dn. de la Rire
existimarit raritates aeris versus Terram decrescere in ratione applicacurum
in Friangulo quod omnino faltum esre constat cum eu raritates aeris potirs
in geometrica proportione decrescunt ut in meo schediasmate demonstravi. Imo
quod magit mirandum, si vel maxime xonatur  ravitates aerit per ordi-
natas in Friangulo posie repriesentari, non inde tamen Cyclois pro lurva Aa
dii Luminosi sed circulus prodibit adeo ut omnino concludendum esse videat
A. Hirium nimium festinanter Schediosma suum in publicum emisisse,
Profectus mei nimis tenves sunt, Vir exne quam ut du putus, Haliam
aut Patavium mihi multum detituram pondere posiim, quod autem
Ampl. Tua tan tenigne de me judicet insigni suu erga me benevolentia ac
amori id trituo. Operam semper dabo ut praeconceptu saltem de me
opinioni et spei quadantenus respondeam, cum ut toti ex asse satiifaciam