# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Piece: https://leibnizlegible.com/api/records/22985/text
# Catalogue record: 22985 — DE LÖSCHERI SENTENTIA CIRCA HUMANAM CHRISTI NATURAM
# Incipit: Quid mirum Theologos Evangelicos multos dicere Christum secundum human
# Date: 1699-02
# Akademie-Ausgabe: AA IV,8 N. 059
# Record in the Leibniz-Katalog: https://leibniz-katalog.bbaw.de/de/extended-search?id=22985&katnr=48427
# AA IV,8: its series at Leibniz-Edition Potsdam I (non-commercial use): https://leibnizp1.bbaw.de/de/edition
# In the Akademie-Ausgabe: AA IV,8, p. 355 (PDF, Leibniz-Edition Potsdam I, CC BY-NC 4.0): https://leibniz-potsdam.bbaw.de/fileadmin/Webdateien/bilder/IV8text.pdf#page=355
# Work: https://leibnizlegible.com/work/00068367
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 9
# Folios: Bl. 378 (from the shelfmark LH 1, 9 Bl. 378): 2 pages, canvases 755–756, page ids 00068367:0755 to 00068367:0756
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068367&page=755
# Lines: 33 recognised on 2 of 2 pages, mean confidence 0.88
# Catalogue: Leibniz-Katalog / Arbeitskatalog der Leibniz-Edition (https://leibniz-katalog.bbaw.de/), ed. Arbeitsstelle Potsdam I der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, CC BY 4.0.
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line, page by page: a "## Folio <label> — <page id>" line ("## Canvas <n>" where no folio label is recorded), "# " lines naming its source image and model, then its recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

## Folio 378r — 00068367:0755
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068367/jpgs/default/00000755.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 29 lines, status machine
quid mirum Theologos Evangelicos
multos dicere christum secundum huma
nam naturam esse omnipraesentem, omni
potentem, omniscium adorandum, cum iten
Terus ndrit Christum secundum qui inte
Menzerus qui praecot caeteris humanae
naturae omnipaesentiam et idiomatum
communicationem in abstracto defendit
seribere non veritus sit, Christum secun
dum humanam naturam esse Deum, nempe
ut Loscherus in consensus orthodoxi pecimine
1699. Witeb. 4. edito excusat, vrrosa-
CiKCds HrcomErcos ratione unionis personalis
praedicatione singulari ot inusitata,
quo ad unionem et communionem perso-
palem ratione unius personae et juxta
attributa personalia, secundum humanam
naturam Mhristum deum esse ex vero affirmasse
u
br. iequi exqu pago
Acta enjudit alips.
d Quod idem est ne si diceret non sicundum
parniam, sed personam Mristum secundum
humanam naturam deum appeltandum.
aquibusdacit humanam Chris.
naturam pecte negani vivificam extra unionem
seu ratione proprietatum nnturalium. sic
et conroversiam de humana susti natura adorandu
litem reshuso motam esse dirimendam

## Folio 378v — 00068367:0756
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068367/jpgs/default/00000756.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 4 lines, status machine
vnetecar
6
378V
d