# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Piece: https://leibnizlegible.com/api/records/26359/text
# Catalogue record: 26359 — Leibniz an Wilhelm Ernst Tentzel
# Incipit: Ad recensionem libelli qui de jubilaeo Typographico objecit Dn. Tenzel
# Date: 1701-06-27
# Sender: Leibniz — Addressee: Tentzel
# Akademie-Ausgabe: AA I,20 N. 158
# Record in the Leibniz-Katalog: https://leibniz-katalog.bbaw.de/de/extended-search?id=26359&katnr=15737
# AA I,20: the volume in the Repositorium des Leibniz-Archivs (CC BY-NC 4.0): https://www.gwlb.de/leibniz/digitale-ressourcen/repositorium-des-leibniz-archivs/laa-bd-i-20
# In the Akademie-Ausgabe: AA I,20, p. 307 (PDF, Repositorium des Leibniz-Archivs, CC BY-NC 4.0): https://www.gwlb.de/fileadmin/Leibniz/repositorium-des-leibniz-archivs/I20A.pdf#page=307
# Work: https://leibnizlegible.com/work/DE-611-HS-867437
# Title: LBr. 915 · Tentzel
# Folios: Bl. 154 (from the shelfmark LBr 915 Bl. 154): 2 pages, canvases 307–308, page ids DE-611-HS-867437:0307 to DE-611-HS-867437:0308
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=DE-611-HS-867437&page=307
# Lines: 63 recognised on 2 of 2 pages, mean confidence 0.91
# Catalogue: Leibniz-Katalog / Arbeitskatalog der Leibniz-Edition (https://leibniz-katalog.bbaw.de/), ed. Arbeitsstelle Potsdam I der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, CC BY 4.0.
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line, page by page: a "## Folio <label> — <page id>" line ("## Canvas <n>" where no folio label is recorded), "# " lines naming its source image and model, then its recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

## Folio 154r — DE-611-HS-867437:0307
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/DE-611-HS-867437/jpgs/default/00000307.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 31 lines, status machine
a quau nostram,
Ad recensionem lbelli sui de
bu Cyponralsicas objecit
it Apribtiroc
i centeliu Laurentium (oster
se non facere autorem, figuramu vel
imaginum opi incisarum el ligno, vel
sed donati et similium librorum sinefiguris
Nec (quod recensio dicat p. 124) Gutten-
tergiam saltem cognitam habuisse hanc
artem ligno iucidendi, neque enia in rem
jam cognitam omnem substantiam effudisset
praeterea in monumento pags. 34. libelli
lentecam extare elogium, ipsum primum
omnium literas ere imprimendas invenisse
Multo minus sibi prodari, quod p. 146.
27. contendatur Mentelium et
Gutsenbergiam esse cundem, quos
in recensione
+
ipse Wdime lingus
p. 125. alligatus clarissime distinguat
licet enim in Epitome non nominef
suttenbergiam, a Mente ho, lamen
diversis verbis facere diversum
Respondi.
 or 27 Junj 170)
irca aintiquitales cypogralsicas
doctissimo duo Echardo quaedam extiblio
C
ut

## Folio 154v — DE-611-HS-867437:0308
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/DE-611-HS-867437/jpgs/default/00000308.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 32 lines, status machine
treca Angusta fobi apud quam eram
cum lle scriberet, suppeditavi quibus
usus est in recensendo legantissimo lis e
libello Tuo. Nonvacat jam relegere
et tuat illus Nihil ad artem
inveniendi facere preto, utrum libur
ex ligno rusculplis litens expressi
snt hologrammi seu careaul figuris
intermistis. Itaque si costerus primus libros
dedisset tiguuscarentes, de quo tamen non
constat, non tamen autor esset typorum
literariorum xyloglypticorum, quando
auteriores aut aequaleslibri extatibus expossi
Non ausim asseverare
am
Guttenbergiam nihil aliud quam hoc novisse
habentur.
fortasse typos solutiles ligneos tantum
commentus sult, initio, aut in aliis haesit
quae Faustie schaesferi consilio fuere
deinde suppleta
Mogunt in monumenti
autorira credo non maxima e
cum
contemporaneum non sit. Mentelium e
Guttenbergiam eosu
em fuisse nemo vipto, sed
cabitatio cautum proposita funt, magisa
n
Wol
aliquis
hufsenbergii letiam nomen geferit