# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Piece: https://leibnizlegible.com/api/records/36621/text
# Catalogue record: 36621 — [De controversiis]
# Incipit: Controversiae quemadmodum civilis, ita et sacrae
# Date: 1677
# Akademie-Ausgabe: AA IV (assigned, not yet published)
# Other printings: VE N.5,6
# Record in the Leibniz-Katalog: https://leibniz-katalog.bbaw.de/de/extended-search?id=36621&katnr=K+25008
# Work: https://leibnizlegible.com/work/00068365
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 7, 6
# Folios: Bl. 42r (from the shelfmark LH 1, 7, 6 Bl. 42r° (42r°unten & v°: Excerpta ex Walenburgiorum libris)): 1 page, canvas 83, page ids 00068365:0083 to 00068365:0083
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068365&page=83
# Lines: 68 recognised on 1 of 1 pages, mean confidence 0.92
# Catalogue: Leibniz-Katalog / Arbeitskatalog der Leibniz-Edition (https://leibniz-katalog.bbaw.de/), ed. Arbeitsstelle Potsdam I der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, CC BY 4.0.
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line, page by page: a "## Folio <label> — <page id>" line ("## Canvas <n>" where no folio label is recorded), "# " lines naming its source image and model, then its recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

## Folio 42r — 00068365:0083
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 43v); this page is its right half.
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068365/jpgs/default/00000083.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 68 lines, status machine
Ontroversiae quemadmodum civiles, ita et facrae vel
ad judicium vel ad causam pertinent, sive ut vulgo loquaentu
vel ad Processum judiciarium, vel ad Merita causae. 
eCBaidcieles
Controversiae quae ad Judicium ipsum pertipent, nonnunquam
generales, praejudiciales liminares dicuntur. Est autem judicium
status hominum rationibus certantium sub exitus sive conchusin
spe. Spes autem Victoriae a certo quodam signo visibili ac nullis
disputationibus subjecto pendere debet. Quale est sex pobetio
perignem ant aquam ( ex betertul omtra aliquid ex varharte rdtident
cectatu singulare, sententiar judiciie Ex ictis vectora
signi allud perfectiasemquos ipsut extilicare epotest
 qualis est Sententia judicis. Caetera enim signa
pleraque novarum saepe difficultatum feracia sunt. Judex
si quid in sententia sua sit ambiguitatis aut obscuritatis, toller
poterit explicando. Fateor tamen nullo judice, opus
fare, si duo litigantes in certam quandam disputandi forman
consentirent, eamque accurate observarent ita  enim
sponte naturae veritas vel certe probabilitas alterutrius
opinionis se detegeret, et pro fudice esset ratio ipsa
Opponitur judicium Bello, quod est status hominum per vim
certantium, ubi nil attinet adjicere exitus spem, cum
in ipsa hujus certaminis natura contineatur, provalente utique
potentiore aut feliciore: at  vero non omnis status
per rationes cortantium judicium est, saepe enim abest
spes exitus utrique sententiam ad extremum tuente, auditoribus q
suspensis. Q
ce
Qui rationibus certant vilisse videbuntur, ubi scopum assecuti
erunt, seppus autem est, vecle evidentia veretatie t
pr ide vel persuadere, vel calcud praemicunt aufera
Nam qui sorte qui monomachia, qui purgatione quam vocant
sive probatione per ignem aut aquam, denique qui formentis
vincit, is non ideo innocentiam suam aut ad versarii culpam
perspcadet, aufert tamen praemium impunitatem scilicet
auterem de qua agitur
Excerpla ex VVallaburgiorum lioris:
Tract. 1. examen principiorum fidei
lenent protestantes per modum principii solam scripturam pusficere ad
probandos articulos fidei. Pe quaeritur an si nullus alius extaret liber
de religione Chripticina quam scriplum sacra nec utta aliunde quicqus
de ea suiri posser ut si fuigamus in aliqual idsula invendum librum
Fingamus horum hunt nanfregio in lasulam ejici
insulonis qui linguam in quasin
Fingamus in aliqs
ansulam in qua homines Arabicum linguam intelligant ejici nanfragio
religionis dis proisu rude
eodicem que sciiplura uerae arabica linqua scriprum. Tollunt librum
incolae myabundi,  et cum caeteris spoliis in unum aceret
Noctu igne concepto mnia comboruntur, sole codi
incolo ldium avide leguntu
laptu mirati sequendum sibi constitmunt, quaeriur an er
ea
eo solo medivcii, judicio ac deligentra sibi veram religione
Emutum sod satulum satis est falaicare concinnare possi
mili id verisimile admodum videtur.
Ecidentia rationis.
pentretia jndicis capentis
E
oi a sententia
judicis, persuasio ipsi
ad versarii, eviclentia rationis.
reperili aliquem
aber intelligat, caetera Christiane
Maris Africum
m cot
v, atto
doctrinam ejus prae