# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Piece: https://leibnizlegible.com/api/records/43581/text
# Catalogue record: 43581 — Leibniz an Des Bosses
# Incipit: Libros qvos remiseras, rectè accepi.
# Date: 1706-07-11
# Sender: Leibniz — Addressee: DesBosses
# Akademie-Ausgabe: AA II,4 N. 135
# Record in the Leibniz-Katalog: https://leibniz-katalog.bbaw.de/de/extended-search?id=43581&katnr=K+5305
# AA II,4: its series at Leibniz-Forschungsstelle Münster (online after accepting its terms): https://www.uni-muenster.de/Leibniz/seite5.html
# Work: https://leibnizlegible.com/work/DE-611-HS-958680
# Title: LBr. 95 · DesBosses
# Folios: Bl. 22 (from the shelfmark LBr 95 Bl. 22): 2 pages, canvases 43–44, page ids DE-611-HS-958680:0043 to DE-611-HS-958680:0044
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=DE-611-HS-958680&page=43
# Lines: 63 recognised on 2 of 2 pages, mean confidence 0.95
# Catalogue: Leibniz-Katalog / Arbeitskatalog der Leibniz-Edition (https://leibniz-katalog.bbaw.de/), ed. Arbeitsstelle Potsdam I der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, CC BY 4.0.
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line, page by page: a "## Folio <label> — <page id>" line ("## Canvas <n>" where no folio label is recorded), "# " lines naming its source image and model, then its recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

## Folio 22r — DE-611-HS-958680:0043
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/DE-611-HS-958680/jpgs/default/00000043.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 27 lines, status machine
Hildes tam
R. P. Baltholomaeo des Bosses Bc. res. Theologo
dmodum Reverende stat
eos
Libios quos remiseras recte accepi. Utinam
esset in quo Tithi utilior esse possem. Hactenus distractisimus
nunc pprimum respondendi oficio salisfaciot morae veniam per
e
Nedo si superfuisset diuitius pelissonius utile aliquid
praestari potuisse sed Meldensis Episcopus quicum conti
nuatum est aliquandiu commercium quanquam superior
illo scientia Theologica, tamen (si dicere fas est) inferior
visus est humanitate
Fateor demonstratione certa nobis data non esse
orecesse nostri dratia, (sed tantum propter alios) ut objectio
ribus respondeatmus: sed hoc tamen nobis semper pro desse puto
cum difficilis objectio est, neque unquam, defugiendum a peritis.
 esse 
sublata enim speciosa difficultate nova lux affulget.
Itaque ego, etsi parsim certus sententiarum, tamen objectiones
amo plansibiles, et puito sempersatisfieri posse: nam si qua
esset invicta, ea demonstrationem in contrarium faceret. Nec
video cur angumentum magis sit demonstratio affirmationis
quam objectio negationis itaque non largior Baylio aut alteri
cuiquam posse rationem fidei. argumenta inse ubit 
neque cum Huetio aut jaquelotio quos refers (et si nctiamicis)
antum adversaris concedere velim

## Folio 22v — DE-611-HS-958680:0044
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/DE-611-HS-958680/jpgs/default/00000044.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 36 lines, status machine
d operam ut quam primum licebit, deo
volente, campo Historico excedam, opere affecto
Ad binas dubitationes ruas venio: Cum
perceptio nihil aliud sit, quam nultorum in
uno expressio necesse est omnes Entelechras
leque
seu Monades perceptione maditas esse momi
ulla naturae Machina sua Entelechiacarat
Meae enuntiationes universales esse solent, et
servare analogiam
nes
Entelechra
substantia esse potest cum non sit aliquod animal vel
peccatum originale nec
nec Anima ejus, sed imperfectio
quaedam nostrae fnime cum et imperfectio in orpore
quasi animal, e
quemadmodum qeHorologi,
vel alterius Machinae imperfectio orta si placet ex
postro respondet.
Etasmate debilitate Madhina utique non est
puto non tantum motui corporis a nobis
apperciptibili, sed et alteri curcunque perceptionem
in nobis respondere, sed quam non animadvertimus, ob
talium perceptionum multitudinem, exiguitatem et
confusionem. Uti n assueti prepitus (qualis motendiui
vicini nostris odibus) apperceptionem carere solemus
primus hono utique alius condi poterat, et pocteri ejus
sed deus eam seriem possibilium elegit in qua peccatum
pravidebat, quod ea aliunde praessaret. Nam etsi quidam
vestrorum dubitent, ego pro ceno habendum, censeo, Deum fecisse
quod optimum erpt factu. Nunc, autem rlecta serie, in uno quoque
individuo omnia alia sed salva libertate involvuntur
quoniam, ita permitis literas Aulverpium destinatas adiicio
vate
ex me amac daber Hanoeres 11 jul. 1706