# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Piece: https://leibnizlegible.com/api/records/58589/text
# Catalogue record: 58589 — [De animarum creatione atque mentium origine]
# Incipit: Animas dicendum est aut quotidie a Deo creari,
# Date: 1683
# Akademie-Ausgabe: AA VI,4 N. 297
# Other printings: Grua: Textes, 1948, S. 552 -Leibniz. Selección de textos filosóficos, Hrsg. J. Arias Cardona, Caldas 2021, S. 259-260 (span. )
# Record in the Leibniz-Katalog: https://leibniz-katalog.bbaw.de/de/extended-search?id=58589&katnr=K+7073
# AA VI,4: its series at Leibniz-Forschungsstelle Münster (online after accepting its terms): https://www.uni-muenster.de/Leibniz/seite5.html
# Work: https://leibnizlegible.com/work/00068378
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 20
# Folios: Bl. 207 (from the shelfmark LH 1, 20 Bl. 207): 2 pages, canvases 413–414, page ids 00068378:0413 to 00068378:0414
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068378&page=413
# Lines: 47 recognised on 2 of 2 pages, mean confidence 0.90
# Catalogue: Leibniz-Katalog / Arbeitskatalog der Leibniz-Edition (https://leibniz-katalog.bbaw.de/), ed. Arbeitsstelle Potsdam I der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, CC BY 4.0.
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line, page by page: a "## Folio <label> — <page id>" line ("## Canvas <n>" where no folio label is recorded), "# " lines naming its source image and model, then its recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

## Folio 207r — 00068378:0413
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068378/jpgs/default/00000413.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 45 lines, status machine
AC
Animas
animea s eo ncedimus aut dicendum
aut quotidie
semel
est eut a D20 treari, aut inde ab initio mundi tam creatas
prae extitisse atque in seminibus latuisse donec formatis organis
exerendi se potestas daretur. Prsus de animabus brutorum
me rati   posterius de anima humana
dicere rationi non satis consentaneum videtur
Nam si animae  brutorum a DEo creantur, atque
ui erunt
infunduntur, omnia plena sunt miraculorum, quod
sive operationum extraordinariarum, quod non satis verisimile
arbitror. Quodsi animas humanas a Deo initio creatas in
quoc
seminibus latere, atque conceptionem expectare statuamue
in aliud paradoxum incidimus, quod scilicet innumero sun
animae humanae maneant in seminibus, nec unquam per
inutiles
veniant ad rationis usum; aut dicendum erit ex anima
tam et huma quod si quis dicat animam quae in semi-
nibus etiam humanis latet brutam esse, demumu
rationalem organis formatis fieri, is dicere cogetur
animam brutam et rationalem non specie, sed organis
differre. Quod adhuc intolerabilius est.
es Rnum bidetur
animas creari tempore conceptionis, is semina humana
ytu dicere
seminibus brutorum deteriora facit, quis enim credat
piubu er. omnium animalium seminibus sive ovariis potuis
in esse animas, hamanis solis inesse nullas. An
in homine quandam animam brutam sive
sensitivam quae sit in semine, set rationalem in conceptione
ergo dicemus est
s
umd detinitioni cujusdam Concilii censetur
 est sumus corporis fonna
vae sit Mens, alteram quae sit sensitiva, quoniam concilium difiniore
adversum. Quodsi igi turnons
se
animam rationalam esse formam corporis; relinquitur ut dicamus
Ex anima sentitiva in nomento obeeti ingosionis a DEO
 nova perfectionis accrentione, sire trans
vrutatione super naturali fieri Mentemiuc animum rationatim.

## Folio 207v — 00068378:0414
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068378/jpgs/default/00000414.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 2 lines, status machine
eeee
ene mosoone