# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Piece: https://leibnizlegible.com/api/records/62533/text
# Catalogue record: 62533 — Motus leges ex abstractis principiis ductae
# Date: 1689
# Akademie-Ausgabe: AA VIII,4 N. 036
# Other printings: Übersetzung: Leibniz: Deriving the laws of mation from abstract principles, hrsg. von Arthur und Ottaviani, Leibniz Review 34 (2024)
# Record in the Leibniz-Katalog: https://leibniz-katalog.bbaw.de/de/extended-search?id=62533&katnr=60080
# AA VIII,4: its series at Leibniz-Edition Potsdam II (CC BY-NC 4.0): https://leibnizp2.bbaw.de/de/leibniz-online
# In the Akademie-Ausgabe: AA VIII,4 (PDF, Leibniz-Edition Potsdam II, CC BY-NC 4.0): https://leibnizp2.bbaw.de/fileadmin/Webdateien/dateien/LSB_VIII_4.pdf#chapter.36
# Work: https://leibnizlegible.com/work/00068164
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Mathematik LH 35, 10, 11
# Folios: Bl. 107 (from the shelfmark LH 35, 10, 11 Bl. 107): 2 pages, canvases 213–214, page ids 00068164:0213 to 00068164:0214
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068164&page=213
# Lines: 63 recognised on 2 of 2 pages, mean confidence 0.91
# Catalogue: Leibniz-Katalog / Arbeitskatalog der Leibniz-Edition (https://leibniz-katalog.bbaw.de/), ed. Arbeitsstelle Potsdam I der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, CC BY 4.0.
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line, page by page: a "## Folio <label> — <page id>" line ("## Canvas <n>" where no folio label is recorded), "# " lines naming its source image and model, then its recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

## Folio 107r — 00068164:0213
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068164/jpgs/default/00000213.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 38 lines, status machine
Debent motus leges ettabstractis principiis posse duci
Et videtur maxime servire haec consideratio, quod
molus semper est cnfermis ex motu prs rectilineo
corporum quatcunque perse discerni non potest, in
quo sit motus; sen omnes Hypotheses Anccedunt.
Ergo et in consequentiis omnes Hypotheses suec
dere debent. Si  nullus est modus discernendi in
determinantibus, nec debet esse in opsis determinatis
itaque nec in circulari debot esse uodus discernendi,
nam firmitas corporum, non aliunde oritur, quam
ex vi quadam quasi centripeto, corpora verpus
se invicem agente, ob motum ambiintium. Et quae
parum recessere magnavi retrosum aguatur et
hoc est firmitas. Causa uttem est motus conspitatio
Cu quae huc absit, nec mutari facile potist. Nempe
pro principio habendum, quam minimund mntari
Ex principio aequivalantium hypothesium sequitur
eandem esse actionum et recectionem seu ictum
varia principia: (1) nihil sit nulla quau iinima
L
in summa
sit motatio. (2) Eadem pervatur quamltas
potentiae. (3) Eadem servatur quantitas directionis
in summa (4) vurs hypothses Motus est
aliquid respectivum seu omnes hsspotheses sunt aequi-
valante s. (SI actio et reactio sunt aequales.
(6) Si determinanitia in si invicem abeant, etiam
determinata in se invicem abibunt. hinc quids est
casus motus, aequalitas in aequalitatis () Nulla fit
untatio per saltum, hinc cra corpaf corpora
flexilia (8) communis motus nil mutas
sequitur ex aequiva entra hyporhesiunt don regula
hac bona, ut ognia serventur quae scrvari possunt
ndeatua seavanda mon
an ergo et servanda quantitas motus, sed ea non potest
servari, servata quantitate potentiae, et non involvit
imnia.
ope virtalis telastica vivera quam

## Folio 107v — 00068164:0214
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068164/jpgs/default/00000214.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 25 lines, status machine
minima sit matatio
est corpora esse flexilia
q0ovy1
euque
cvo
quq
2 B6
6voo
it hinc eliam
necesse
E diversis princistiis ae aiqua via semper
demontrai possiunt, sed difficile est uetula
in timam analutium reperire, seu ostenderte quid sit
Omnium primum. Ommin. famen videntur pendere
in discemibilibus
ex hisc principio quod simulbis exislentibus deter
minantibus etiam similia sint detemdinata
dete atque discemi nequeant. Unde sequitur
quod in motu etiam potest post concursum una
HHypothesis ab alia discerni nequeat
tem quod mi quam minima semper
debet esse mutatio. Unde non quid
sufficit teandem quantitatem motus servar sed
 potentium quia ea omnia involvit
nempa effectum et actionis re fectionem