Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 20, fol. 402v
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.73.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- 13. Theilis argument (as j)nach conserved, §. 3.) it proves
- any thing, in wautes that God withor dick, quod non create aty Mutter
- ard
- V
- at all Cloeause the Situation of aequal, item similiarants of Matter, cauld
- not out be originalles indifferent: As also the original determinatien
- of their Motibu, this way of the controvers way.
- 20. that this Lands to prove, with regard to the Argument
- 2
- before us, I understand not
- 21. That God can not limit the Quantity of Mutter, is an
- Assertion of too great consequence to be admitted Without Prof.
- Ihre commot limit the Duration of it neither, men the materia Goes
- is both infinite et eternal necessariis and independent lij upon God.
- 22. et 23. this engagement, (Iit it were good,) would propre that
- Watever God can alo, he can not do; et consequently that he
- caenot but make very things ofinite, et verything eventual; which
- is maxime himmo yourneur, et all, but a mere necessarii Agent,
- tant is, im deedino Agentat all, but mere Anté et Plature et
- M. Necessitis
- 6
- 74 — 28. Concernimus the Ilse of the Werd Spons (thourgh
- Haac Newton say4 only, as it were the Scot; e
- de
- has veen laid in my Choro Papir, §. 10, et second Faber, §. 13. et
- et,
- and
- 23. Spece is the Plâce of all Thing. Auf all das
- et Fircht Paper, §. 13. (§. 15.)
- just, as Ducation is the Duration of all Thomas, and of allerdres
- in
- chat this has me tendencis to make Tode the indul of the word
- see abbreparer 2d. § 12. Were is no Union bet w
- the Wolii. The blind of Man mogut with creature propositus
- be, apud the soul of the images of things which it Speiores,
- i
- than Tod can be Myled the soul of the Boyle, to which, he
- present Phroughont, et guts upon it as he plenses, Hithout beim
- ic
- acted upon by it. Thouch this Amßirer Was quaest on suivon before (Paper
- 28, § 12, 3 get the same objection is respective begam et again
- Without tahing any static of the Auswer.
- P
- 30. That, es meant bij un dimcipe repraesentatif,
- understand not. The Coul, discours thmgs, by Navinus the Emages
Cite
Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 20, fol. 402v. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model k3-trocr@runs-615-epoch-5, run 617). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068378:0808?run=617