The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance, fol. 152
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- 152
- Pell the canses ofjoy. Sothat thenecessity of the actionstaketls
- avay neither of those partsof repentance, frief for the errour
- norjoy for thereturnine. And for Prayer, mhereas he saith
- thatibe necessiey ofthines destroyes prayer, Ldeny it. For thouch
- prayer benone of the causes that moove Gods Will, his Will be-
- ins unchanseable, yet since ve find in Gods Word, he will not
- sive his blessines but to those that aste them, the motive topray-
- er isthe same. Prayer is the siftof God, nolessthan the bles.
- fines. And the prayeris decreed rogether in the same decrec
- mbercinthe blessine is decreed. Fismanifest, that chantesgir-
- inc is no cause of the blessine past: and that which is past is
- sure, andnecessary. Tet even amonest men, thants is in use
- as an actenomledeimentof the benefit past, thouch me sould ex-
- pect no nem benefit for our cratitude. And prayer to God Al.
- michey is but chanlessivine for his blessines in general; and
- thonch it precede the particular thins me aste, vet it is not a
- canse or means of it, but a sienification that me expect nothine
- but from Cod, in Cuch manner ashe, not as me will. And oux
- Saviour by mordof monthbidsus pray. Thy will, not our will
- bedonc, and by example teaches us thesame, for he prayedthus,
- Factier, iF ic bechy will, lec chis cup DalS, _C. The end of
- prayer, as of chantessivine, is not to more, but tohonour G0d
- Almiehey, in actenomledsins that hat me aste can be effected
- byhimonely.
- a
- Hlope. Ilo Wi Depersvaded in rime, thac ic is noc
- the Coreroulnels, or Ambicion, or Senluailier, or Sloch.
- or Prejudice oF his Readers which renders chis doctrine of
- absolurenecessiey danserous, buc choc ic is inies onn nature
- destructirero erue eodliness; a And choust liis ansiver
- consist more oF opposicions chan ofsolurions, vec lwill noe
- willinely leare onc grain ot his marterunveished. b First
- he erres in makivs inmard piery co consilt meerly in thec-
- Rimation oFche judsement. TEchis vere (0, Whachinders
- buechacche Derils Monld haveas much inward piecy asthe
- Bect Christians, Forches elteem Gods poverro be intinite.
- and
Cite
The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance, fol. 152. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0164?run=74