Leibniz Legible

Machine transcription of the Leibniz Nachlass

Search the Nachlass

The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance, fol. 318

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.75.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. 18
  2. vaschreun: Ee char makes chelo co be necessari causes, Ido
  3. nas mondor ifhe make all effects necelsary effects. TFany onc
  4. otchese canses beconrinsene. it is susticient co render che east
  5. concingene; and nou chacchey are 2Il so contingene, vec he will
  6. needs hare the effect eobe nocessarr. And soic is whenche
  7. castischromn, buc noc betore rhe cast maschroun, irhich he
  8. undercook eo prore. Who can blame him For heins lo angry
  9. nich che School. men, and cheir distinctions oF necesey into
  10. absoluro and hypocherical, sceins chey touch his Frechold(0
  11. nearVs
  12. Buc choush huis inttanco ofrainins eo morron be imperti-
  13. nenc, 25 beins no tree action, vec because he criumptis (0
  14. much in his arxumene, Twill noc Rick co 80 a licele oue ol my
  15. aycomeot a friend. ForP contels, che ralidier ofthereason
  16. had been che lamo, ithe had made ic oF a trec action, as thuS:
  17. Ficher PMaII finis ehis reply comorroir, or P Mall noc sinimti
  18. ehis replyto morrem, is a necellarr propoticion. Buc because
  19. he Mhall noc complain of ans ditadrantasse inthe alceration ot
  20. his cerms; P will for once advencure axon hie Mover nerain.
  21. AndErH, P readily admic tris major chac chis propolicion (either
  22. iE willrain co morrom, or ie will noc rain eo morron, is necella-
  23. rilyerue. For oftuvo contradictory proposicions, the one must
  24. et necessier becruo; because no chird can be siven. Buc lis
  25. minor, chac ic contd net he necessarily erue exeopt one of the Mlom
  26. bors vere necessarils enne, is most falle. And so is his proof like.
  27. vise, chac is reicher the one nor the orher ofthe Members be ne-
  28. cessarily erne, it sannot be affirme d chat either the one, or the orher
  29. is true. A conjunet propolicion may have boch paresFalle, and
  30. vec che proposicion beerue, as is chesuu mine, ie is day, is a
  31. erue proposicion ac midnishe. AndT. FI. confellectr as muet.
  32. DCumb. 19. YF Battlive TAall ear, is a necessary proposirion,
  33. ehae is e0 say, it is necossary ehat that propostrion sould be true
  34. mhensocven actored. Dur it is not tho necessiry of thethine, nor is
  35. it therefare necessary that che manshall live, or that the manstall
  36. ons. And (0 Z. FI. procceds, Ido not uso ro forriste my distincti-
  37. ons with suoh reasons. Duc ie seemeth he hach Forsoecenhim-
  38. SelF, ond is contented wich such poor Forcificacions. And ehouet
  39. Boch pares ota disjunctire propotrion cannoe be Palse, becaule
  40. 1
  41. 15
  42. i
  43. i
  44. i
  45. 71
  46. iBC
  47. dele
  48. sIII
  49. rait
  50. 1B
  51. tnc
  52. il
  53. H
  54. Moc
  55. i
  56. El
  57. ROE
  58. tai
  59. bne
  60. H
  61. INI
  62. Pat
  63. i

Cite

The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance, fol. 318. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0318?run=74