Leibniz Legible

Machine transcription of the Leibniz Nachlass

Search the Nachlass

The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance, fol. 331

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.88.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. 33
  2. ro (eu what itchiey do noc come, hen a certain prediction mu
  3. Fail. Ie may beurged, thac chere is a difference becween chele
  4. ero cases. In chis case che comins is presene eo ehe W aEch.
  5. man, buc chac which Cod Fore knousis future. Cod knoveo
  6. Whac MaII BC; The WVacch. man onelu knows WBaCis. I an-
  7. siver, ehac chis maties no ditlerence ac all in ehe case, by reason
  8. oF chac dispariey which is becween Gods knomledse and ours.
  9. Aschac comins is present rothe Wacch. man, which is Future 1O
  10. ehem whoare belom: So aI chole chinss, Wtich arC FUITUTC LO
  11. us, are present co C0d, Decause his Infinice and Fcernal knon-
  12. ledse dochreachi ro the fucure beins oFall Agenes and erents.
  13. Thus uch is piainsy acknowled sed by F. FT. NTumB. IL. XLaE
  14. fore.lenom ledee is lnomleige, and enomledee dep. n senthe exi-
  15. stence of thethines tenvn, and not they on it. To conclude, che
  16. Prelcience of Crod doch noc make chinesmore necessary, than
  17. che production ot che chinss chemsetres; Duc il ehe AGenES
  18. ere tree Agenes, che production ofche chines dochnoc make
  19. che erenes ce De nbtolurely necessary, bue onely uxon supposi-
  20. tion chac che causes were s0 derermined. Gods prescience pro-
  21. vech a necellier oE intallibiner, buc noc ot ancecedent extrinse.
  22. CaII decermiracion eo one. It auy evene MouId nOE COMCCO
  23. PalS. God did never screanow chac ic monsd eome eO paIS. FOr
  24. every tnomledse necessarily preluppoleth its object.
  25. Animadversions upon che Ansiver
  26. tO NumB. Z XXVI.
  27. (a) P F Y F conid add he Paith orter Argumens, is lie
  28. L choushe ic 8ood Logick, _c. Thereis no impedin
  29. mene in Losick, Why a man may noc presse lis adverlary wich
  30. chose absurdicies which Row Fromhis opinion. J FPere hemiss re-
  31. cires my mords, atich are T coud add, iF P choup(IE iE BOOdLO-
  32. sick, cheinconrenience ot dengins necestiey, as chac ic destrors
  33. Boch ehe Decrees, and Prescience BFCiod AImigBIEy. BuF he
  34. males me say Tcould addother Areuments; then inferrs, that
  35. there is n impediment in Logick, hy a manmaynet presse his
  36. adversaris rish ehe absurdiries ehat Ron from his opinion, becanse
  37. C
  38. ArGU.

Cite

The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance, fol. 331. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0331?run=74