The True Intellectual System Of The Universe, fol. 181
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.94.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- H A P. III
- sromthe Hleat and Cold of ihe Dviverse; srom whence it appears, Ihat
- Ariltorle also held the worids Animation, with further Ondeniable
- Proos thereos. An Ansiver to Tvo the most considerable places of that
- Philosopher that seem 10 imply ihe contrary. That Aeistocles First
- Immoreable Mover, mas no Soul, but a Perfect intelleet abstrait
- srom Matter, but that he supposed this to move onty as a Final Caule,
- or as beins Loved, and besides it a Muncane Soul and Placticte
- Nature, 1o move ihe Heavens Ffficientty. Neither AristOLes Na-
- ture nor his Mundane Soul the Supreme Deity. Hovever, thoneh
- there be no suct Mundane Soul as both Placo and Aristocle, con-
- ceived, yet notwithstandine there may be a Plastick Nature dependins
- upon a Hieher Intellectual Principle. 25. No impossibility os some o-
- ther Particular Plastick Principles; and thoueh it be not reasonable
- to think, that every elant, Verb, and eile os Orass hath a elastick
- or Vecetative soul os ilsomn, nor that the Farth is an animal; yet
- that there may possibly be one Plastick Inconscions Nature, in the
- Whole Terraqueous Clobe, by whieh recetables may be severally oreani-
- Zed and sramed, and allthines performed which transcend ibe Porver
- of tiortnitons Mechanism. 26. Our second Ondertahine which was
- tosem hor erosty those atheists. (who actnomledee this Plastick Na-
- ture) Misunderstand it and abuse ihe Notion, 10 mahe a Counterseit
- Cod almistrer or Numen of il, 1o the exclusion of the True Deity.
- First, intheir supposine that to be the F irst and Lliehest Principle of 1e
- Dniverse, which is the L. ast and lomest of all Lives, a thine as Eessenti-
- ally Derivative from, and Dependent upon a Hieher Intellectual Prin-
- ciple as the Fecho on the Orisinal Voice. 27. Seconcly, in their
- matiine sense and Reason in animals to Fmeree ont of a Senstess Lise
- os Nature, by the mere Modisication and Oreanization os Matter. That
- no Duplication of Corporeal Orsans, can ever mahe One sinele Incon-
- Scions Cise, 10 advance into Kedoubled conscionsness and Self. enjoy-
- ment. 28. Thirdly, in attributine Perfect Knomledee and Vnder-
- Standine 1othis Tise of Nature, whichyet themselves suppose to be de-
- voidos all animal sense and Conscionsness. 29. Lastly, in makine
- the Plastick Tise of Nature to be merely Corporeal; the Hylozoists con-
- tendins that it isbut an Inadequate Conception of Body, as theonly
- Substance, and fondly dreamine, that the rulear Notionof Cod, is no-
- thine but such an Inadequate Conception of the Matter oF the Whole 2.
- niverse, mistaten for a Complete and entire substance by it sels, ihc
- Eause of alt Thines.
Cite
The True Intellectual System Of The Universe, fol. 181. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066509719:0201?run=74