The True Intellectual System Of The Universe, fol. 769
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.88.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- e
- 1
- 0101
- ael
- CHAD. IV. Arh. Incor. Space, Non Senle.
- chese in our Days, ctac Body, Or chac Whichis Zansible and Divil.
- ble, is che Ouly substantiat Ihine, trom Whence ic Eollons, chac an
- incorporeal substance vould be the Pame rich au Incorporeal Body, 1. e.
- an impossibiliey, and chatthere ean beno Incorporeal Deity.
- But in cheManarement oE chis cause, there hath been Pome Dica
- Greemene amonest The Athessts chemselves. FOr FirIt, che Democri
- tichs and Epicureans, chouxh consentins with all the ocher Atheists
- in ehis, Thacwhacloerer as Dnextended, and devoidof Maeninde
- Was chereFOre Nothins; (P0 chac chere could neither Be, any sub-
- stance, nOr Accident Or Mode OF any Substance, 2 nextended) did
- nocwichstandins distinguist concernins à Donble Nature. FirI.
- Chac intrich is (0 Exrended, a5 to bc impenetrable, and Tangible
- Or Resist ihe Touch, Wtrich is Body. And Sccondly, Thac wrhich is
- Extended al(o, but Penetrably and intansibly, Wrtrich is SpacC OT Va
- cuum: aNature, accordins cothem, really distinet From Body, and
- che onty incorporeat Zhins chat is. Nom since this space whict ie
- ihe ouly incorporeal, can neicher Do nor suffer any chins, buc only
- rive Place or Room to Bodies eo Subilt in, or Pals choroueh, chere-
- ore can chere noc be any active, Understandine. Incorporeat Deity.
- Chiisis che argumentation oF che Demoeritick atheists.
- To which ine Reply; That iE Space De indeed a Nature distinct
- rom Body, and a Thing Really Incorporeal, as chey pretend, then will
- uc undeniabiy follon trom this verr Principle ot cheirs, thac chCre
- must be incorporeat substance; and (ehis space beins suppoled by
- ehem also co be Infinite) an Infinite Incorporeal Deity. Becaule il
- DPaCC BC nOL thC Extension OF Body, nOr an Affection ThereOF; TheM
- mult ic oE necestuer be, cicher an accident Existine alone by it selF,
- tontout a substance, hich is imposTible; or else the Extension OL
- affection, OE some ocher incorporeat substance, that is infinite. BUI
- here will Cassendus Rep in, Wo help out his 8o0d Friends, the Demo-
- ritichs and Epicureans, ae a dead Lisc; and undertakee to maintain.
- nac chouxh space be indeed an incorporeat Thins, yet it mould nei-
- Cher Pollon OE neceCTIEy trOm chenCE, chat it is on Incorporeat Sub-
- stance Or Afection THCTCOE, HOr y et that ic is an accident, Exittins 2-
- loneby ic selE ithout a substance; becaule chis space is really, nei-
- cher Accident, nor substance, but a certain Midale Nature or Essence
- berwixc Boch. Towhich Subcertuse oF his, that WC May nOE quar-
- rel about WVords, e Mall makce chis Reply; Thac unquestionably.
- VhaEsOever I5 or harh any kind oE Entity, doch cicher SubSC
- y ic selE, or else is an Astribuse, Affection, Or Mode, OE lomettiine
- ihac doch Subsist by ic sels. For IE is Certain, That chere can benO
- Mode, Accident, Or Assection, oF Nochins; and consequemly, ChaE
- Aochins CanHOEDC Extended, nOr Aensurable. But iE Space BC nei
- Cher che Pxsenscon OE Body, HOE vet oE Substance Incorporeal, tHem
- multic OE nececTuY BC, Che Extension OF Nothine, and che Affection
- de Nochins; and Nochins must DC Mensurable by Tards aud Poles.
- Veconclude cheretore, Thactrom ehis very Hypothesis oF the Demo-
- ritick and Epicurean Atheists, thac space is a Nature distinet trom
- Body and Posirively Ensinite, ic Follons undeniably, that chere must BC
- Forie
Cite
The True Intellectual System Of The Universe, fol. 769. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066509719:0789?run=74