Leibniz Legible

Machine transcription of the Leibniz Nachlass

Search the Nachlass

A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. 28

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.89.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. Gen. 26.
  2. The Lords Supper a F’ederat Rite.
  3. ihe Tame Analogr, he must necds caII che Communion. Table By che
  4. name ot the Toras Table, i. e. the Table uxon itrich cods Meat
  5. is caten; noc his AIIaE, uxon irhich it is oftered. TLis true, an Altar
  6. is nochins but a Table; but itis a Fablenpon which COD himselfeats.
  7. consumins che Sacrifices by his holy Fire: buc When tHC (aMCMCaL Is
  8. siventrom GOD unto UIS to eat oF, the relation beins changed,
  9. che place on rhich W P eat is nochins buc a Fable.
  10. And because it isnot enouxh in any Discourse, as Aristorle ell ob-
  11. Terrech in his ethicks, 10 contute an Error, untels me can also Mew
  12. 20 avrior 28 + 6855, the Cause of that Error; havins chus discovered
  13. the True Notion of the Loras Supper, we may casuy discern trom
  14. hence al(o hon chat mistakle srew ip, and chat by che degeneration
  15. oE chis Truch. Thereis a Sacritice in che Lords Supper Cymbolical.
  16. Iy, butnocthere asoffered up eo Cod, but Scasted on by us; and (0
  17. noc a Sacrisice, but a Sacrifieral Feast: Whieh besan t00 loonto bC
  18. misunderstood.
  19. CH A P. V1.
  20. Thefarcher Improvement of that Ceneral Notion, Nom the
  21. Lords Supperis a Federat Rite between Cod and us, at
  22. laree: concluded with a memorable Story, out of Maimo-
  23. nides and Nachmanides.
  24. Stould nom come tomatee (ome Farcher Improvement oF this Oe-
  25. Deral Notion of the Cords supper, by Ceine Whac thele Feasts upa
  26. on the sacrisices did Gignitie under the Lam; and chen applvins thc
  27. Tame in a more perfect manner to the Cords supper under theCospel.
  28. beino warranted chereunco by chac Analogy wrhich is betreen chem.
  29. Buc Because chere may DC divers Oloses and Interpretations of thele
  30. Fealts upon che Sacritices, Wrhich are obrious to every common un
  31. derstandine, me will decline them all, and picch onlr upon one,
  32. erhich is noc (0 vulsarly understood; and ie is chis, That the Fatine of
  33. Gods SacriACES NaS a FF DER AL RTTF betoeen Cod and those
  34. that offeredihem; accordine to the Custom oF the Ancients, and e-
  35. specially in chose Oriental parIS, to contirm and ratitie their COve-
  36. nanes by Facins and Drinkins cosether.
  37. Thus when Isaac made a Covenant with Abimelech the Rins OFCe-
  38. rar ehe Text Caich. Ee made him and those that came oith him a Feast,
  39. and they did Fat and Drink, and rose up betimes in the mornine, and
  40. svare to one another.
  41. When Taban made a Covenant with Tacob, Cen. 3F. Ver. 44. Nom
  42. therefore come (Caich Laban) let us mahe a Covenant L and thon and let it
  43. be for a witness beteen me and thec: Then it Follons inthe Text, Ther
  44. tookstones, and made a Beap, and did eat there upon theheap; and Laban
  45. called it J E G A R. S AH ADUPH A, in his Chaldee PonguC, but
  46. facob (in the Hebre LAnBUASC) OAL P PD, 1. c. Aheap of witness;
  47. implyins chac chose stones upon hich cher had cacen and drunte
  48. togecher ould Be a witnels against cither oF them rhat Mould Arst
  49. violate chaE COrEHANE. R. Moses Bar Nachman in his C OmmenE thuS
  50. slollechrpon chis place, hrzuh NZSZ GINZ ZHI NI p12SIZ DGB ∞V 1h3N
  51. D, VZW
  52. 1

Cite

A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. 28. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0040?run=74