A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. -
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- Phe COnFeNLS.
- I AWS and EAEC, a5 10 ATatter, not meer Multiply Cintities withont Decessitr. The
- Coxiration in ihe Ninc of God bnt an Sont endued mith a Plastick Nature, the
- Fnerperick and PRectual Principle in it. Chies Pormatrix of its oron Body the con-
- And ihis Plastick Nacure, ihe Prue and tribution ofother Causes not excluded. 166
- 23. That, besides the Plasticke in Par-
- Proper l’ace ot NTALCF, or of ihC CorpO-
- reat WVorid. IVBat Maxicke is, and that ticular Animals, Formine them as so ma-
- Nature mbich acteth FacalIY, acteth also ny Licle Words, there is a General
- Plasticte or Artisicial Nature in thC
- Maxically and Sympachecically. P. 161
- 19. That Nacure, thoueh it bethe Di-
- Whole Corporeal Dniverse, which likevise,
- accordine 10 AristorlC, is either a PAIE
- VinC AEC, Or PacC, vet for al that, i5 nei-
- iher a G0d nor Coddels, but a Lom anc and L. Orver Porver of a Conscions Mun
- dane Soul, or else somethine dependine
- Imperseet Creature, it actine Arcisicialy
- and Racionalr, ne otberroise than Com-
- thereon.
- 167
- 24. That no less accordine 1o Aristocle,
- pounded Forms of Letters, when Printine
- Coherent Philosophick Sense; nor for than Plato and SOCrateS, Our selves par-
- Fnds, ihan a Sum or Flatehet in ihe hands take os Lile from the Lile ofthe llniverle,
- as vell as ve do of Feat and Cold front
- os a stilsul Mechanick. The Plasticle
- and Veretacire Lile of Nature, IhC Lom- ihC Eleat and Cold of the D niverse. From
- est of all Lives, and Luferiour 10 the Sen(i- mbence il appears, that aristorle also held
- cire. A Hipher Providence, 1han that ihe Worids Animation, which is further
- os ihe Plasticte Nacure, sovermine ihe Ondeniably proved. An Ansiver 10 Tvo
- ibic. Ihe most considerable Dlaces in that Phi-
- 20. Nocrwithstandine rehieh. forasmuch losopher objected to the contrary. Lhat A-
- Corporeal WV orid it sels.
- as ihe Plastick Nature is a Lite, it must ristorles l’irst Immoreable MOveI mas
- necds be lneorporeal. One and ihe self no Soul, but a Perfect Intellect abAract
- sarse thine, havine in il an entire Modet from Macter, which he supposed to move
- and Plat form of ihe WVhole, aud actine onely as a l’inal Cause, or as BCins L. OV-
- ed; and besides this, a Muncane Soul
- cannot be a Body. And thoneh Aristorle and Plasticle Nature 10 movethe Hleavens
- upon severat Distant parts os Malter,
- bimsels do no rmbere declare ihis Nature PFicienely. Neither Aristorles NatIC
- 10 be cither Corporeal or Incorporeal, non Mundane Soul rhe Supreme Deuly.
- llorvever, thoueh there be no such Mun-
- Crtrich he neither elearty doth concernine
- the Racional SOuI) and bis Follovers
- commonty talie it 1o be Corporeal, vet,
- dane Soul, as both Plato and Ariltorle
- conceived, vet may there be notmithstand-
- ine, a Plasticle or Artificial Nature de
- Philosophy, must il necds be otterroise. pendine upon a Flieher Incellectual Prin-
- 168
- accordine 1othe Cenmine Principles oF That
- 165 ciple.
- 25. No Impossibility of other Partieu-
- 21. The Plastick Nacure beine Incor
- Porcal ns esther be a LOiver Porrer lar Placticles; and thoueh it be not rea-
- rodeed in Souls, mhich are also Conscions, sonable 10 tbinte every Plant, Herb and
- Sensicive or Rational; or else a distinet D’ile os Grass, to have a Plastiele or Vese-
- Substancial Lise by it Setf, and Interi- cacire Soul of ils oron, nor 1b0 F. Aeth 10
- our Soul. That ihe Placonicts assirm be an Animal, vet may there possibly be
- Both; vith Aristortes acrecable Deter- one Plasticle Artificial Nacure presidine
- MinatiOn; TBat NAEurC is CIthEF PANE OF over ihC Whole TerraqueOUS OlObC, bY
- ibid. which Pecetables may be severally orsa-
- 22. The Plasticte Nacure as 10 ihe Bo- nized and Framed, and all chines per-
- a Soul, or noc wichoue SouI.
- dies of Aimals, a PAIE, or LOrVeE POW- Sormed, mhich transcend the P’over of
- e of their respective Souls. That ihe Forcuitons Mechani(.
- 26. Our Second Cndertakeins, Which
- Archeus in AnimalS; 10 make which a vas 1o Shom, Nom erosty those Acheilts
- Phaenomena prove a Plasticke NaEuTC Or
- distinet ihine from ihe Soul, moulat be 10 (Cmho actinomledee this Arciticiat P laltiete
- Nature.
Cite
A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. - . Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0116?run=74