A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXXIX
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.93.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- The PR F F AC F.
- my purpose, that he denied the individuat
- Unitr ofthe divine FVence, Which cannot
- be chareed on the Author of the neW Fx
- plication, and so this comes not home to
- the purpose.
- 3. But the last charge is the most terri-
- ble, for it not onty sets donnthe Herelie,
- but the capital punistoment Which follo d
- it. Tet Tsal make it appear, (notvith.
- standine the very warm Prolecation of ic by
- another hand) that there is a creat disse-
- rence between the Doctrine of Valentinus
- Centilis, and that which is asserted in this
- Explication.
- I. In the Sentence of his Condemnation
- it is expressed, Thac he had been guilty Brief A-
- count os
- oF che vilest Scurrility and most horrid valentin
- Blasphemies asainst the son ot crod and cencilis,
- the slorious Myctery of theTrinity. But P. 132.
- can aur thine of this Nature be chareed up-
- on onc, Who hath not only voritten in De-
- fence of it, but speates of it with the hich.
- est Veneration:
- 2. In the same Sentence it is said, TH2C
- he achnomledged the Father only tobe ibid.
- that intinite Crcd wrhich re ouxheto or-
- Cip, irhich is plain Blasphemr asainst
- the Son. But can any Men ever think to
- make this the same case withone, who mates
- use of that as one of bis chies arguments,
- EMaE
- XXXIX
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXXIX. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0045?run=74