A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 27
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.76.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- Oi
- i
- ele
- ts
- et
- St
- M
- Dc
- et
- o
- re
- 5B
- th
- 1
- at
- the Doctrine of the Frinier.
- the Son oF Joseph and Mary. What do
- chese men mean by Tuch Pusgections as
- chele: Are they resolved tolet ux Deism
- amons us, and in order thereto, t0 un
- dermine che auctoritr of the New Tecta-
- ment: For it is noc only S. Matthews
- Gospet buE S. Fukes and S. Johns Whrietr
- ther Arikce aC, under the pretence et re-
- presentins che argumenes ot thele retch.
- edFbionites. IFcheir areuments are mean
- and crittins and merely precarious, erhry
- are they noc Dichced and ansivered by
- suchas pretend to De Chrictians: IF cheY
- think ehem good, we sec whrat we have
- to do with chele men; it is nor thC D0.
- etrine of the Trinity, (o much as the autho-
- rity ofthe Cospels, Which ive aretomain-
- tain against them: And noc chose ony
- For the Ebionites rejected alt S. Pauls P
- pistles; and called him an apostate and
- a Transcresor of the LaW. Whac Cay our
- Onitarians tothis: Why truly, Thiscomes Ansver 10
- from Epiphanius, and because he quotes no Dr. BulI
- Author, it scems to be one of his malicious
- Tales. This is a very MOrE Way OF an-
- sverins, it il would Patissie any men ot
- sense. Buc ther ouehe to have remem.
- 35.
- bred thatwithin a tew Pages, ther alledec P. 40.
- Epiphanius a5 a very competent Witnels
- about che Fbionites, because he vas born
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 27. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0099?run=74