A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 49
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.88.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- 1S
- att
- es
- re
- the Doctrine of the Frinity.
- in a place already mentioned. But upon
- scareh I could find no other pround torit,
- bue a pastase or trro in Sandius, Whro is
- none et the exactestHictorians. In one
- place he laith trom an oblcure Polist Chro. Sand. Bist.
- CnuCL. b. 3
- nicle (extant in no orher Languase but P. 357.
- Ot that Connery) chat the Bulsarians
- Whenthey first received Christianity embra-
- ced Phocinianism. And is noc this verr
- 500d Authorier amons us: Fromhence
- hetakces it for granted, that they al conti-
- nued Photinians to the time of Pope Nico-
- la5, Who converted them. But all this is
- orounded on aridiculous mistatce in PI
- tina, Who in the Lite ot Nicolas Caitt,
- that the Pope consirmed them in the Faith,
- pulso Photino; Whereas ic Phould DC pulso
- Phorio; For Phorius ae that time WWas Pa-
- triarch ot Constantinople, and as appears by
- his first Existle, alsumed their C’onvertion
- tohimselt; and inlicted upon theright ot
- Turildiction over that Countrr. Sandius
- reterrsto Blondus; Who Caithno suchthin
- but orly that the Bulsarians ivere conver-
- ted before; Wvhich is true; and the Cireck
- Hictorians, as foh. Curopalates: Zonaras, and
- Others, sives a particular Account of IE 3
- but not a mord ot Photiniani(m in IL. 50
- velty;
- P. 372
- BlOnd. DeS.
- that the Archbisop had very great realon
- co charse cheir Interpretation rieh No-
- E
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 49. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0121?run=74