A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 56
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- AVindication of
- Conableness oF this Charse From cheso
- thin95.
- L. That there is a Difference Detween
- a Contradiction in Numbers, ard in the Na-
- ture oE thines.
- 2. That it is no Contradiction to asere
- tbree Per sons in One Common Nature.
- 3. Thac it is no Contradiction co Cay
- that there are three distinct Per sons in the
- Trinity and not three Gods. IE Icanmatie
- out these thines, I hope I may abate
- Tomethins oF chac Aranse and unrealona.
- ble contidence, Wherewich these men
- charse the Doctrine oF che Triniey wich
- Contradictions.
- c. Ibcsin miththe Arst oF them. And
- I Mail dram ux the Charse in cheir omn
- vords. In one ot their late Boolis they
- have chese Words.
- oryos Theirs, they Cay, is an Accountable and
- Reasonable Faith, but that of the Trinita
- rians is absurd and contrarr both to Reason
- and ro it self; and therefore not only false
- But impossible. Bue Wherein lies chis Im-
- possibilitre That ther C0on telluS. Be-
- cause we affirm that there are Three Per-
- sons Who are severally and each ofthem true
- Cod, and vet there is but one true God.
- Nou, Cay chey, this is an Prror incountine
- or numbrins, whieh when steod in is of all
- Di Bers
- theDnitar.
- d.gt.
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 56. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0128?run=74