Search the Nachlass

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 58

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. AV indication of
  2. the Chrictian Church hath (0 long Cince
  3. condemned for Heresies. But it may be
  4. with the lame Cirilier cher will (ay, Iu
  5. vas brutisply done of them. But can these
  6. Men oFSense and Reason chinte, chat the
  7. Point in Controverlie ever Was, Wheclier
  8. in Numbers, One could beThree, Or Three
  9. One: IF ther chink (0, T onder they
  10. do nocthinke ot anocher chins; wrhich is
  11. che bessins aII Frinitarians FOr Fools:
  12. because they CanNOE COUE One, Tvo and
  13. Three; and an 2nitarian Jury wouldcer-
  14. cainly caltthem. One vould chinke such
  15. Wricers had never sone beyond Shop.
  16. books; For cher talce ic for granced, thac
  17. all dependsuxon Conntins. Buc cheleter-
  18. rible Charses vere lome ot the mosteom
  19. Interrosane enim nos mon andtrite Objections of In-
  20. aliquando Insideles, de di- AdelS. St. Ausust in mentions it
  21. a5 uch, Whenhe Caich, the Insi.
  22. spondemus Deum. Fili dels sometimes aste us, what de vou
  23. callthe Father. We ansiver, 60d.
  24. What the Son: ve ansiver, 60d.
  25. quemdicicis, Deumdici- WVhat the TToly Ghost: we an
  26. siver, God. S0 that here thc
  27. Pilius eo Spiricussanctus Intidels make the lame Obje-
  28. etion, and dram the very lame
  29. Interence. Then, lay they
  30. the Father, Son and JI. Ghost
  31. bene. Au5. in Joh. FF. 39. Three 6ods. Buc whac saith
  32. d. AU-
  33. CiEis, eum dicitIs? Re-
  34. um eoem dicicis. Deum
  35. dickis: Respondemus
  36. Deum Spiritum Sanctum
  37. eisiCespondemus Deum.
  38. Ferg inquiune, Pater de
  39. eres Tune Vei. Relpon-
  40. demus, Non. Turban
  41. cur, quia non illuminan.
  42. cur ese claulum habent
  43. guta clarem hdeinon ha-
  44. cunc, Paerem quem di-

Cite

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 58. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0130?run=74