A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 108
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- Vindication of
- EIVO WayS: P. ThC one true 60d, 25 ha-
- vins the true divine Nature in him, and
- Cothe F’arher 15 the one true 60d; but nOE
- exclusire of the Son, it he have chelame
- divine Nature. 2. The one true G0d, a5
- harinsche divine Nature Co Wholly inhim-
- self, 25 to make it incommunicable tothe
- Son; so re do noc lay, thatthe Lather
- IS the one true God, because chis mult
- exelude che Son trom beins God; Which
- the Scrixture altures us that he iS; and
- cheretore thoush che son be noc the Pa-
- ther, nor the Father the Son, vec the son
- may be the one true 60d a5 Wvell a5 thc
- Facher, becaule ther bochpartake of the
- same divine Nature, lo that there is no
- contradiction in chIs, That there is but
- one true God, and one of the Persons is not
- the other. For chac luxpoles it impos
- ble, that chere Mould be three Perlons in
- the lame Nature; but il the diltinction
- OE Nature and Persons De allowd, a5 it
- must be by all thac understand any chine
- ofthele marters, then it mult begranted,
- chat althoushi one Perlon cannot bc ano-
- cher, yet they may have che lame com
- mon LsenCC. AS For instance, let us
- calce their own, Peter, Fames and John.
- Wrhat plealant arguins vould chis be,
- Peter 1S nOL Fames nOr John, nO fames
- 1
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 108. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0180?run=74