A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 110
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.89.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- AVindication of
- Persons may be well Caid 10 DC Co. equat
- and Co. eternat; and it Wve Llonour the
- Son as ve Llonour the Father, we must
- sive equal Glory to him.
- But ionc great Point ot contradiction
- remains, Viz. Sothatthe Facher isCiod,
- Cd
- the Son is Crod, and che Holy Chost is
- Ciod, and vet there are not threc GodS;
- but onc Crod.
- Firct, they Pay, This is as if a Mansould
- Cay, the Father is a Person, the Son a Per-
- son, and the TToly Chost a P erson, vet there
- are not three Persons; but one Person. HOW
- isthis polsible, if a Person dochi suppose
- lome peculiar Property, ehich must di-
- Stinsuist him trom aIl ottiers: And how
- ean three Persons De one Person, unlels
- three incommunicable Properties may be-
- come one communicated Properes t0
- chree Gerlons: But they are avare ot a
- Diltinetion in this Calc, viz that theterm
- Crod is uled Personally, when it is Caid
- Ood the Father, C0d the Son, and Cod the
- FTolr Ghost; Due when it is Taid, There are
- not three God5. but one 60d, the term 60d
- is used Pssentially, and theretore compre.
- hends the hole chree Pertons, (o chat
- Noceson A. C ether a Grammatical, nOr Arith
- chanas. bis medum Contradiction. And Whrac lay our
- latians tO ThIS: FruIy, nolels, Than
- tha
- Creed, P.
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 110. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0182?run=74