Search the Nachlass

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 112

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.92.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. AVindication of
  2. are distinct, and therefore must be distinct
  3. Cods, since every one is distinet from the o-
  4. ther. They are distinet a5 to per sonal Pro-
  5. perties, but nOtaS tO Pssential Attributes;
  6. Wtrichare and must bethe lame in aII: 50
  7. that here is but one Essential God, and
  8. threc PersonS.
  9. But aster all, why de ve assert three Per-
  10. sons in the Godheadd Not Decaule re find
  11. ehem in che srhanasan Creed; but becaule
  12. the Scripcure hach revealed chat there arc
  13. Threc, Father, Son and Holy ChoA; 10
  14. erhom ehie Dirine Nature and Actributes
  15. are siven. This me verily beliere, that
  16. the scripture hach revealed; and that
  17. there are a great mans places, ot whrict,
  18. We chink notolerable sense can be siven
  19. ithout ic, and cheretore ve altere this
  20. Doctrine on the Pame Grounds, on Which
  21. re beliere che Scriptures And if there
  22. are three Persons Wrhich have che Divine
  23. Nature actribuced to them; What must we
  24. do in ehiis Case. Must we cast of the2.
  25. nity of the Divine Fsence: No, that ist0O
  26. trequently and plaintr asterted For us t0
  27. call it ineo Question. Must ve reject
  28. those Scriptures wrhich actribure Diviniey
  29. to the Son and HolV Gholt, as well ast0
  30. the Facher: That we cannot do, unlels me
  31. Cast oH those Boolis ot Scripture, Wrhereim
  32. thole

Cite

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 112. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0184?run=74