A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 140
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.93.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- AVindication of
- Flearis, perpetuat Presence, promisé of the
- Spirit, remission of Sins, etc. But S. Tohn,
- as the time required, attributed the Name
- and Pover of Cod to him fromthe bezinnine.
- S0 that by the Name and Pover of C0d
- he means the Came which he called the
- divine Nature Belore.
- 2. He Caich, thac When it is laid, The
- Word vas with God; it ouoht to be un-
- derstood as tenatius explains it, with the
- Father; What can this mean, unless he
- understood the Word ro De the eternat
- Son of 60d: And he quotes Terrullian
- Pavins, thac he is the Son of Cod, and
- C0d ex unitare substantix; and rhat
- there vas a Prolation,of the Word with
- out Separation. Now Wvhrac Prolation can
- there be ot a meer Attribure: HOW can
- that be laid to De the Son of Cod becotten
- of the Father, without Division, before alt
- Worias, a5 he quotes it trom fustin Mar-
- Err. Andthac he is the Word, and 60d of
- Ood From Fheophilus Antiochenus: And
- in the next Verle, Wrhen it is said The
- same vas in the becinnine withGod; it is
- repeated on purpole, laich he, That WVC
- misht consider, chat cod is (0 to DC un
- derilood, thata Diltinction is to be made
- Detween Cod, with whom be vas, and the
- Word ioho vas with C0d; so that theWrord
- doth not comprehend alt that is 6od. BuE
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 140. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0212?run=74