A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 176

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

1. A Vindication of
2. Father: That is well, but that is no farther
3. than the Tewrs ∞o (For ther ovn one God;
4. and one Person.) Into the Son: That is be-
5. vound them, but noi vet perfect. Into the
6. TToly Chost e Tes, laith he, this is per-
7. fect Baptism. But Wohat is the common
8. Name of these three, ounacti 20 25DC5
9. Plainly, that of Cod. Buc this learned
10. Critick observes, that Hilary in some Co-
11. pies takes no notice of this Form. Thatis
12. truly observed, for the very Conclusion
13. iS nOt LlilaryS, but calen out oF S. Fe-
14. rom; bue it hre had 100kd inco Hilaris
15. WVorks, he vould have found the Form
16. ot Baptilm omned, and alterted by him.
17. eritar. L. L.FOr he noc ontr sets it donn as the Form
18. a Print. of Faith, 25 Well a5 our Baptism appointed
19. By Christ; but argues trom ic, against the
20. Sabellians and Fbionites, a5 Wvell as others.
21. Thus re sec how very Arons and reioh.
22. cy the Arsuments of chis learned Criticke
23. WVCTC.
24. a 2d 22

Cite

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 176. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0248?run=74