A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 181
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.92.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- the Doctrine of the Frinier.
- this Couneil propounds an expedient as
- most aerccable to elie general sense ot
- che Chriction Church, viZ. That if any
- relinguised their TTeresie and came back
- to the Cburch, they Bould aste them the
- Erced, and is ther found that ther vere
- baptized in the Name of the Father, Son
- and Foly Chost. they Bould have onty im-
- position of hands, but if they did not con-
- fess the Trinity, their Baptism vas decla-
- red void. Now this I lool on as au im-
- preonable Testimonr of the sense or the
- Ante. Nicene Fathers, 2iz. Thar eliey did
- not allo chat Baprim which as noc in
- the Name of the Father, Son and TToly
- Ghost; Or (ertrich cher underHtood tobe
- thelame) in the confessionof the F’aith of the
- Trinity. How then can our Dnitarians
- pretend, That the Ante. Wicene Pathers did
- noc alledce the Form of Baprism to prove
- the Trinity: For the words are, If ther
- do net ansuer eothis Trinitr let them bebap-
- rized, Caith this plenary Conncil, 25S. Au-
- sust in otren callS IL. What Frinity. do chev
- mean: Of mere Names or Cyphers, or ot
- one C0d and tuuo Creatures joyned in the
- lame Form ot ords, a5 our Dnitarians
- understand ic: Burther affirm, That the
- Ancients of 400 vears do not insist on this Ausiver 10
- ext of S. Marthew to prove the Divi-
- MIi bP. 18.
- Mt
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 181. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0253?run=74