Search the Nachlass

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 183

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. the Doctrine of the Frinir.
  2. Praxeas was the Arst, at lealt in che
  3. Wectern Church, Wrho made Father. Son
  4. and FToly Ghost, to be only severat Names
  5. of the same Person, and he mas with great
  6. Warmch and Visor oppoled by Tertul-
  7. lian, erhro charses him Wich introducine à
  8. neu opinion into the Church, a5 Will pre-
  9. senels appear. And his celtimony is the
  10. more considerable, becaule our Vnitari.
  11. ans Contels, That he lived F20 vears be-
  12. fore the Nicene Conneil, and chat he par-
  13. ticularlu insiIs upon the Form of Baptism
  14. acainst Praxeas. But eo what purpole:
  15. Was noc his wrhole desion in chat BoOkt0
  16. P. 17.
  17. AdverF.
  18. prove chree distinet Persons of Father, Son PraX. c. 26.
  19. and TToly Ghost, and vet but One God: Doch
  20. he noc lay expreAr, That Christ command-
  21. ed that his Disciples Bould baptize into the
  22. Father, Son and Toly Ghost, not into One
  23. of them; ad finsula nomina in Perionas
  24. linsulaS EInSIUT. In Baptism ve are
  25. dipped once at every Name, to sheu thatwe
  26. are baptized inio three Persons. IE is Cer-
  27. tam chen, chat Tertullian could ROE MI
  28. Aatre the Sense of the Chureh (0 GrolY,
  29. 25 to tale three Persons to bc only three
  30. severat Names.
  31. HC grantS 1O Praxeas, that Father, Son C. 2.
  32. and Toly Chost are one, BIE HOW: Per u-
  33. nitatem substanciae, becaule there is but
  34. Ove

Cite

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 183. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0255?run=74