Search the Nachlass

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 208

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. Fulcb.
  2. A Vindication of
  3. been receir d amone them. And nothine
  4. can be Fuller than the Auchoriey oF his
  5. Teltimony, it S. Basit may De believed.
  6. To these PBaIl add the Doxology oF
  7. Euseb. 1. 4. Polrcarp at his Marerrdom, mentioned
  8. by Fusebius, Wrhich is verr fuII to our
  9. Purpole; P Olorisie thee by our Fternal
  10. TTich. Priest Tesus Christ thy beloved Son,
  11. By whem be Clorv to thec, with him in the
  12. Coly Ghost. Whac can ve imagine Po.
  13. Ercarp meant by this, but to render the
  14. Same Olory 10 Father, Son and LToly Chost:
  15. but rich luch a ditterence a5 to the Par-
  16. ticles, Which S. Basil at larse provescome
  17. co the lame thivo: And cothe lame pur-
  18. Pole, noc only che Chureh ot Smorna,
  19. but Pionius the Martrr, Whro transcribed
  20. the ACS, Speakins ot fesus Christ, with
  21. iwhom be Glorr to Cod the Father, and the
  22. Voles. 2d Fzoly Chost. These Cutterd Martyrdom
  23. for Christianier, and omned che lame Di
  24. vine Honour coche Father, Son and TToly
  25. Chost.
  26. irtrat could chey mean, il they did
  27. not Deliere chem tohave thelame Divine
  28. Nature: Can re luppolethem Guiley ot
  29. Tuch Rupidier to lose their Lires, For noc
  30. sivins Divine Honour to Creatures, and
  31. ac the lame cime to do it chemselves: 50
  32. chac, il che Father, Son and Toly Chost
  33. WerC
  34. Coreler.
  35. VII. P.
  36. 1027.

Cite

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 208. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0280?run=74