Search the Nachlass

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 216

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. Ul. b. I.
  2. A Vindication of
  3. And the Plaronick Notion ol che Divine
  4. Fssence intareins it self 1o three TTyposta-
  5. ses, is Considerable on thele ACCOUMIS:
  6. T. Thac it is deliver d wich s0 much
  7. alturance by che Opposers ol Christianiey;
  8. Luch a5 Plotinus, Porphrrius, Proclus and
  9. orhers nere lnoon eo bc, and cher spcake
  10. Wich no manner ol douvr concernins IL3
  11. Crril. c. s may be seen in the pastases oF Porphy-
  12. rie preserved by S. Crrit and ochers.
  13. 2. That chey 1o0l it up trom no Re-
  14. velation; but a5a Norion in it Celf agreca-
  15. ble enoueh; as appears by che pactages
  16. in Plaro and others concernins it. Thcy
  17. never suspected ic to be liable 10 che
  18. Charse ot Non-Sense, and Contradictions,
  19. 25 our modern E nitarians charee theTri-
  20. niey icl; althoush their Norion asre-
  21. prelented by Porphrrie b0 a5 liable t0 it.
  22. Hlow came these Men of Wit and Senle,
  23. ro hic exon, and be lo fond of such absurd
  24. Principles Wrhich leadto cheBeliet ofMy.
  25. Aerious Non-Sense, and Impossibilities;
  26. il these Men may be trusted:
  27. 3. Thac the Nations most renomned
  28. For Antiquier and decp Speculations, did
  29. lislue uxon the lame Doctrine, about a
  30. Triniey ot TEypostases in the Divine
  31. Essence. T0 prove chis PMall noc reter
  32. e0che Frismexistick Boeks, Or ihe Chaldee
  33. Oracbesqu

Cite

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 216. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0288?run=74