A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 259
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- the Doctrine of the Friniey.
- mon to alI. Wtrich makes them ot one
- kind: and if the difference of Kinds BC
- real, thac which makresthem ot one tind
- and noc of anocher, must not be a Nominal
- But Reat Fssence. And chis difference
- doth not depend uxon che complex Ideas
- of substance, Whereby Men arbirrarily
- Joyn Modes rogether in their Mlinds; FOr
- lec ehem mistakre in the complication os
- their Ideas, cither in leavine OuE, Or pur-
- tinq in What doth noc belone cothem, and
- let their Ideas De ihrat cher please; thc
- Reat Fsence oF aMan, and a Horse, and d
- Prec, are just wtrat chey vere: and let
- elieir Nominat Lsences difter neverlomuch,
- tlic Reat common Fssence, Or Nature ot tho
- several kindsare nor at all alter d by them.
- And thele Real Pssences are unchancea
- ble: For, hovever there may happen
- lome varieey in Indiriduals, by particu-
- lar ACCidents, vet ehe FssenceS OF MCN
- and Horles, and Prees remain alrarsthe
- Came; becaule thez do nor depend on che
- Ideas oF Hen, bue on che Will ot che
- Creator, Who hach made leveral COrts ot
- Bein95.
- 2. Let us now come to che Idea ot a
- Person. For, althousl che common Na-
- eure in mantind De the lame, y et ve lec
- disserence in thesereral Indiriduals trom
- Or
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 259. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0331?run=74