Search the Nachlass

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 280

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.89.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. AVindication os
  2. use ot. From Wrhence Iconcluded, That
  3. all we can actain ro is, a tull Sacisfaction ot
  4. our Reason concernins CodS Fcernicy
  5. alchovoh e can form no distinet Con-
  6. ception ot ic in our Minds. But When
  7. theseMen inllead ot ansverins che Arsu-
  8. ment trom ail che Notions of Pterniey.
  9. ouls dispuce asainst one Nocion ofit, ther
  10. apparenelu mew che Wealinels ot their
  11. Caule, il ic will bear no orhier Detences,
  12. buc such 25 chis. For Itaheit, thac che
  13. mainDebare in poine ol Realon depends
  14. upon this, whecher e ean be certain ot
  15. cheBeins of a Thins. olnhich wecanhave
  16. noclear and distinet Idea: IF e may, then
  17. ir can beno Objection in point ot Revela-
  18. tion, chac we can have no clear and distinct
  19. Idea oFtheMarter revealed; (ince there cun
  20. De no Rcalon tocie us up Prieter in Point
  21. Ot Revelation, than e are wichout it.
  22. IE we can be cerram in Reason ot mans
  23. thinos, re can have no tuch Ideas ot,
  24. Wrhac imasinable Reason can chere bC,
  25. chac a Point ol Faith Mould be rejected
  26. On ThAE dCCOMHI.
  27. 2. Iursed another Acrribute of 60d,
  28. Vi2. his Spirituality For che lame Realon;
  29. 2iz. chat reare lacistied in poine of Realon
  30. chac Cod must bC a SpiriE; and VeE WC
  31. cannoc lave a clear distinet potrire No-
  32. eion ot d dpIXIL.
  33. ABC

Cite

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 280. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0352?run=74