Search the Nachlass

An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. 48

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.89.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. ecco ). o)
  2. amonsst whichu Pchink, L’la Wel aecoun Solict); mieh therctore
  3. Mallereat oF in FhC neXF Chapter.
  4. ET A
  5. ) Solidity.
  6. 5. F.
  7. FTE Idea OF Solidity, e receire by our Fouch; and it ariles
  8. trom theResistance we find in Body, to theentrance oF any o.
  9. cher Body into the Place it possesses, till it has lete it. Therc is no Idea
  10. Wrhich ve receiremore constanty from Senlation, than. Soliditr. Whe-
  11. elier e more, or rest, in Wrhat Pocture loerer we arc, tre alvarsfcel lome-
  12. thins under us, that suppors us, and hinders our farther sinkrins dorrn.
  13. ards; and the Bodies re daily handle, makre us perceire chac rhilst
  14. ther remain becrcen them, ther do by an insurmountable Force, hinder
  15. the axproach of the parts ot our Flands thar press them. That erhich
  16. thus hinders the approachi of trro Bodies, wrtien ther are morino one co-
  17. wardsanorher, PCall Solidity. L Will noc dispute, Whether this accepta-
  18. tion ofthe WVord solid be nearer to its Orisinal Signitication, chan Fhat
  19. erhrich Mathematicians usc it in: I fustices, chac I chinse, the common
  20. Norion oF Solidity will alloir, il noc justitie, chis ule of it; but il any one
  21. thintc it better to call. it Impenetrability, he has my Consent. Only I
  22. hrare choust che Term Solidiry, the more prover to exprels this Ideas
  23. not orls because olits vulgar ule in that sense; but also, because it car.
  24. ries Comethins more of politire in it, than impenetrability, Which is nega-
  25. tire; andis, perhaps, more a consequence ot solidicy, than Solidiey it
  26. SelE. Fhis oFall other, seems the Ldea most intimately connected with,
  27. arid essential to Body, (o as no irhere else to be found or imasin d, DuE
  28. onr in matter; Wrhich thouch our Senles takenonotice ot, but in masses
  29. OFmatter ota buIk, sufficient to cause a Sensation in us: V et theMind;
  30. havirs once gotthis Idea trom luch grossersensible Bodies, traces it Farther
  31. and considers it as evell as Figure, in theminutest P’article ot matter, that
  32. con exist, and fnds it inseparabls inherent in Body, Where erer, orhorre.
  33. ver moditied.
  34. 5. 2. THIS IS EIIC Laed DCNO WBOdY, erherehy We conceire it +0 fll
  35. space. The Idea oF which fillins oF space, is, Fhat erhere e imagine any
  36. space cakten up by a solid Substance, ire coriceire it (0 to Posels it, that it
  37. excludes al ottier solid Substances; and, will For ever hinder atiy twoo.
  38. cher Bodies, thatmore torards one another in a strait Linc, trom comine
  39. totouch onc anoctier, unless it remore trom betrrcen them in a Line,
  40. noc parallel ro thatches move in. This Idea oE it, che Bodies Wve ordi
  41. narily handle sufficiently Furnisti us ith.
  42. 8. 3. This Reliltance, Wrhereby it kecps other Bodies out of the space
  43. IE pOsseTTCS, IS (O GrCAE, THaE nO TOrCC, HO GreAE IOCVer, CAM LUROUNE IE.
  44. AIIthe Bodies inthe Worid, prestins a drop of Water on aIl sides, vill
  45. never De ableto overcome ehe Relultance it vill matce, as Tott a5 It i5,
  46. totheir approachins onc anocher, till it be remored out ot their waz:
  47. Wrhereby our ldeaof Solidity is distineui shed Boch from pure space, Whien
  48. is capable neither OF Resictance nor Morion, and the ordinary Idea OE
  49. harduess. FOF a Man may Conccire iro BOdies aE a dillance, (0 as 1hc
  50. May

Cite

An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. 48. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/778263916:0064?run=74