An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. 90
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- Duration, and its simple Modes.
- ralcen into the Computation, by any one who will estimate or measure
- Motion, (0 as to judse ristr oFit. Nor, indced, docs Motion ans other.
- vise conduce tothe mealurins of Duration, than as it constantly brinss
- about thCreturn oF certain sensible Ldeas, in sceimine equidistant Periods.
- For il the Motion ot the sun, trere as unequal as of a Strip driven by un-
- Ready Winds, Sometimes very NOW, and at OrHers, irregularly very swift;
- or it beins constantr equally TvisE, it Yet as nor circular, and produced not
- the Paire Appearances, it Wrould nor at aII help us to measure timc, any
- more than the scemino unequal otion ot a COmet dOcs.
- 5. 23. Minutes, FCours, Days, and Lears, are then no mOre necessary to
- Time or Duration, than Inches, Feet, Vards, and Miles, marked out in
- aHY Matter, are to Extentior. For thiouoh ve in this pare ot the Uni-
- verle, by che constant ule ofthem, as Periods set out by the Rerolutions
- OFEhO SuH, Ox LCHOWN PaxES OF TheMI, have Axed the Ideas OF (UCM L enGTHS
- ot Duration in. our Ninds, erhich we applY to all parts ot Time, whose
- Lenschs me vould consider; vet there mas be other ports oF the Uni-
- verle, Wvtiere ther no more ule those measures ot ours, than in Japan they
- do our Tnches, Fcet, or Miles: but yet somethins Analasous to them,
- there must Be. For wittrout lome regular periodical returris, we couldnot
- measure our selres, or signitie to others the lensth oF any Duration, thougn
- at the same time the Norid rere g5 FuII oF MOtion, a5 it is no; but no
- Part of it dispoled into regular and apparent equidistant Revolutions. But
- the different meatures chat maz be made use ot Por the accoune of Fime,
- do noc at alt alter the notion of Duration, vrhichis thethins to be meatu:
- red, no more than the different Candards of a Loor and a Cubit alter the
- norion ot Extension, to thole, who malse ule of thole disterent Mcatures.
- 5. 2.5. The Mind havins once sor such a mealure of Time, as the an-
- Dual Revolution of the Sun, can apply that meature to Duration, Where.
- in that meature it selF did not exist, and with erhich in the realitr ol its
- Deins, ic hac nothins todo: For ould onc (ay, That Abraham WaS BOrH
- in ElC 27F2 Vear OF thC Fulian Period, it is altosether as incellisible as
- rectonine from the besinnins ot the World, though there vere 10 far
- Backno notion of the Sun, nor any other motion at alI. For thougt
- the Fulian Period be supposed to begin several hundred rears betore there
- verereally cither DayS, NigHES, Or VCarS, marked out by any Revolu-
- tions ofthe Sun, ret we reckon asright, and therebs mealure Durations
- a5 WelI, as if realsy at thactime the sun hrad existed, and Kope the lame
- ordinary morion it doth nO. THC Idea of Duration equal t0 un an-
- nual Revolution of the Sunisas calily applicable in our FhougtEs +0 Dura-
- tion, wvhere no Sun nor MTotion vas, as the Idea OF a FOOt or Vard takcen
- trom Bodies here, can be applicc in our ThougHES to Distances, berond
- the Contines oF the Worid, Wrhereare no Bodiesat aII.
- 5. 26. For suppolins it vere 5639 miles, or millions ofMiles, trom this
- place tothe remorest Body ofthe Oniverse, (For Deins finite, it must bc at
- a certain diltance,) as re suppose it tobe 5639 ycars, From this time to
- thehirst existence ofary Bods in the besinmins of the World, ne can, in
- Oux ThougHES, apply this measure of a Tear to Duration before the Crea-
- tion, or berond the Duration of Bodies or Motion, 25 e can this mea-
- fure ot a Mile to Space Derond the utmolt Bodies; and by theone mea-
- ture Duration, wtiere there as noMorion, as rellas by the other mea-
- sure Space in our Thouohs, Where there is no Body.
- 5. 27. TF it be objected to me here, That in this ay ot explaining of
- Time, Ihave becd wtrat I Bould not, viz. That the World is neither
- eternal, nor intinite; Lansiver, Thar to my present purpose, iL iS nOL
- necd.
- BC
Cite
An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. 90. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/778263916:0106?run=74