An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. 231
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- Chap. IX.
- imperfection of No
- LL 1L L. 1X.
- 6. 1.
- Of ehe imperfection of Words.
- Rom Wrhac has been Paid in the Poresoins Chapters, il is ealie
- to perceire, wtrat impersection there is in Lariguase, and ho
- theverr nature of Nords, malces it almost unavoidable, for manz ofthem
- to De doubrsul and uncertain in their significations. Fo examine the
- perfection, ox impertection oF Words, it is necessari, First, to consider
- their ule and end: For as ther ore more or less fcred toactain that, (0 are
- they more or lels pertect. Wehare, inthe former part ol chis Discourle,
- often, upon occasion, mentioned a double use of Words:
- First, One For the recordins ot our omn ThougHIS.
- Secondly, The ocher For the communicatins of oux Thouetts io
- Others.
- 6. 2. ASEOChetr OPthese, for ihe recordine our onn Thouxhes, For che
- help ofour omn Memories, Whereby, as it vere, We talk to our selves
- any Words will serre the turn. For since Soundsare voluntarr and indit
- ferent sions otans Ideas, a Man may use what Words he pleale, t0 signi-
- sic his omn Ideas to himselF: and there will be no imperfection in them,
- it he constaney ule the tame sien For the same Idea: FOr TMeN HE CONLSE
- Fail oEhavins his meanins understood, wherein contits cheristu usc and
- persection ot Languase.
- 8. 3. Secondly, As E0 communication by Words, chat 100 vas a double use:
- I. Civil.
- II. Philosophicat.
- Firs By cheir civil Ese, Tmeansuch a communication oE Thouxts and
- Ideas bY Words, as mas serre for the upholdins common Conversation
- and Commerce, about the ordinary Afairs and Conveniencies oF civii
- Tise in the Societies ofNTen, onc amons (t anOther.
- Secondly, BY the philosophicat se oF Words, L mean such an use oF
- ehem, as miar serre to correr tho precise Notions of Thines, and tO Cx-
- prels, in general Propositions, certain and undoubred Fructs, Which chc
- Mind may rest uxon, and be latissled with, in ies seareh after rruC RnO
- ledge. Thesetmo Dses are very distinct; and a great deal lels exactness
- viil serve in the onc, than in the othier, as re Mail sec in Whrac tollors.
- 5. 4. The chieF Fnd oF Lansuase in Communication, Deins to be un-
- derstood, Words serre not well for that end, neither in civil, nor philo-
- Tophical Discourse, When any Word does not excite in the FCarer, the
- Tamme Ldea ertrich it stands for in the Mind ol the Speakcer. No since
- Sounds have no natural connexion rith our Ideas, Dut have all their
- signitication from the arbitrari impolition otMen, tne doubrfulness and
- uncertaire of eheir signification, Wtrich is the imperfection ve here are
- speaktino ol, has its cause more in the Ideas chey stand For, than in ariy
- incapacits there is in one Sound, more than in another, ro lienitie any
- Idea: For in that regard, eher are all equally perfect.
- That chen wrhick malies doubesulness and uncertainty in che sonitica
- cion oE some Words more chuni orters, is the disference ot Ldeas Mhes
- cand For.
Cite
An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. 231. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/778263916:0247?run=74