Search the Nachlass

An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. 318

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. 8 nomledze of Fxistence of other Thines. B00k L
  2. Mind, thac chinkins Thins wichin rou, do nordeem it RransC, that You
  3. cannot comprehend the Operations ol chat eternal insinite Mind, Who
  4. made and govers all Things, and whomthe Licaven ol LICaVENS CAnNOE
  5. contain.
  6. d. T.
  7. CII A P. XI.
  8. Of our Rnomledge of che Fxistence of ocher Things.
  9. He Knomledse ot our omn Being, e have by intuition. Zhe
  10. Existence ot a COD, Realon clearly makes knon to uS, 25
  11. has been Mewn.
  12. The Knouledse of the Fxistence of any other thine, we can have onty by
  13. Sensation: For chere beins no necestary connexion ot real Exiltence,
  14. vich anv Ideaa Nan hath in his Memorr, nor et any ocher Existence
  15. Butthat ot GOD, With the Existenee ot anr particular Man; no parti-
  16. cular Man can lnow the Lxiltence otany other Being, but ontr irhen br
  17. actual operatins uponhum, it malies it selt perceived by him. For the
  18. havins ehe Idea otans thins in ourMind, no more proves che Fxistence
  19. OF chat Thins, than the victure oF a Man evidences his beins in the
  20. Worid, Or the Vilions oF a Dream malee thierebr a true Hictory.
  21. 9. 2.Fis theretore the actual receivins ot Ideas trom wichour, thac
  22. sives us notice ofthe Exiltence ol orher Thines, and matces us Hnon,
  23. that Comethine doth exist at thar time ithout us, irtrich causes that
  24. Idea in us, though perhaps e neither bnom nor consider hor it docs it:
  25. For it tales nor trom the certainty of our Senses, aud the Ideas We re-
  26. ceive by them, that re lnom not themanner erherein ther are produ-
  27. ced: v. 8. Whilt Perite this, Phare, by the Paper affectins my Ey es, that
  28. Idea produced in my Mind; Wrhrch whacever Object caules, lcallirhite;
  29. Oy WrhichIbno, that that Dualier or Accirlent (i. c. evhose appearance
  30. Betore my Fyes, alvays causes that Laea) doth really exist, and hatha
  31. Beins ithout me. And ot this, the greatest asturance I can possibly
  32. have, and to which my Faculties can actain, is che Testimons ot my
  33. Fyes, Which are che prover and sole Fudses oFchisthing, and whose Te-
  34. simons Thare reason ro rels on, a5(o certain, chat I can no more doube,
  35. WrhilstP urire chis, that Isec Whitc and Black, and chat Comething really
  36. exists, that causes that senlation in me, than chat I vrite or move my
  37. FTand; erhich is a Certainty a5 great, as humane Nature is capable ot,
  38. concernins the Existence oFans Thins, bur a Mars sel alone, and of
  39. GOD
  40. S. 3. The notice ve have by our Senses, of the existing of Thines witbout
  41. us, though it be not altogether so certain, as our intuitive Rnowledoe, or
  42. che Deductions of our Reason, employ d’about the clear abstract Ideas ot
  43. our oirn Minds; vet it is an allurarice thar deserves the name of Rnou-
  44. ledee, it re perluade our selves, that our Faculties aet and intorm us
  45. riohe, concerning the exiltence of those Objectsthat affect them, it can-
  46. noc pass tor an ill. srounded contidence. For L think nobodr con, in car-
  47. nest, De (0 sceptical, as tobe uncertain of the Exiltence of thole Thinos
  48. hesces and Fecls. AF lcalt, he thar can donbt so tar, (phatever he mey
  49. have ith his own Thouelits) will never have any Controverlies wich
  50. me; since he can never be sure Y say ars chins contrars to tis. Opinion.

Cite

An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. 318. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/778263916:0334?run=74