Leibniz Legible

Machine transcription of the Leibniz Nachlass

Search the Nachlass

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 39

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. Dut il it must be notlins wrhen it is not
  2. in action, W hac then can the Soul be, but a
  3. certain Pover actine in the Body; When the
  4. Body is prepar d for the exercise of it, and
  5. ceasino 10 Be When the Body is indispos de
  6. But (tO retort che Remarkers Words)
  7. Whether that be a Superiour Divine Pover di-
  8. stinit from Mlatier, as a vis mOVeNS, Or a
  9. Porror fastned L tenor not hom to the Body,
  10. or nnon such and such Systems of Matter
  11. whether TCay of these tro Suppositions better
  12. acrees with this Doctrine, Lcannot certainly
  13. tell; but either of them descroys the Immor-
  14. tality os the Soul, upon the Dissolution of the
  15. Body. Llezic the Reader 1o judse whieh
  16. is mosc concernd in this conseguence,
  17. Mr. Lock, Wh0. (2YO that it is notnecessar
  18. totheEristence oErhe Soul chatit Mou d
  19. De alrors in action; hichroud DC ab-
  20. TUrd tO CaY, iE it De not a distinet permanent
  21. Substance: Or the Remarkeer, hothinks
  22. the Soul cannor Fxist, when it is nOL IM
  23. aetion; vrhich chereisno groundto thintu
  24. it it Dc areal permanent Substance.
  25. Jhe Vanier ot Mon seciris to DC tho
  26. Sreat Rcason irhy ches have so readily
  27. Tupposd, nithout ans proot, thacthesoul
  28. does alirars think; For havins no ldca ot
  29. IE, DuE Dy its operacions, e arcunilline
  30. to perccire our oren ignorance, and loach
  31. to part ith the onlr Idea me hare ot
  32. thac deur chins rrhich we call selt; on
  33. this Acconnt che Remarker sccms oftended
  34. WitHMT. Lock. Why (TaYS HC) do vor af-
  35. firm or introdnce a nem and nnintellisiole ? R. P. 16.
  36. FAt6

Cite

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 39. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0051?run=74