A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 52
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.87.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- order irhich e knom is agrecable tothe
- Dirine Will, br thecontormits it has to
- our Reaton, which 15 a Ray ot his onn
- Wisdom. Wemiil suppose the HIcathen
- conrincd by chele Arouments, or Others
- 1o che Tame purpole, that he oAS IE 15
- hishly reaionable to conclude there musti
- DCa Future State ot Renards and Punis.
- eHES; BuF he docs not (0 WeII disest the
- Sous beins immaterial, he has no nO-
- tion ot a Substance micliout any Fixton-
- Sion. Suovole then the Remarter Mould
- FeIl him, a5 h0 dOcsNIr. LoCK, IF the SOUI
- IS BOF Immaterial, There can DCnO CertaIn
- proot that it is Immortal. And I delire
- him to talie this Dilemma For the flea-
- thens Antver: Ficher the Arsuments by
- eehich I hare Dcen conrincd chat there
- iIl De Punihinenes and Rerards in a
- Future Statoare Proots ofit, or thes arc
- HOE; IF not, then tho the Soul Bould be
- Immiortal, Lhare no aturance chat ic will
- bc in a cate ot Rewards or Pummments:
- and il ther arc Proots ot a Future State,
- then a Future State IS equalls certain,
- tho the Soul be not Immaterial, since
- That does nor moke it less consonant to
- the justice and Wisdom ot God, nor less
- ithin his Pover. IBeliere the Remarker
- Wiil Aird he has no ray to solve this Di
- Terma, Duc must cither sire up the cer.
- tainty et Revards and Punisments, Or
- the necessity ot chinkins ehc coulis Imma-
- ceriul, to prove a Future State; and l de-
- sic him to establisa the Belict ot Renards
- aue
Cite
A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 52. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0064?run=74