Search the Nachlass

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 61

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.86.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. Tn
  2. ane
  3. AEt.
  4. do
  5. 11
  6. Lar of Nature irhich Mr. Lock is no lets an
  7. adrocacefor thanhe, tho he denrs Innate
  8. Principles, Which leads me to a very ma-
  9. terial obserration, which is, that chrovoh-
  10. out this whole Discourse, the Remarker,
  11. uses indisterent IY, 25 Perms ot the Pame idc. P. 5.
  12. signitication, Law of Nature, Natural Con-
  13. Science Innate Principles, Innate Povers, and
  14. Natural Princples, Which all signitie rery dif-
  15. Ferent thinss;and of wrhichMr. Lock hason-
  16. 9. 13.
  17. IY denied Innate Principles: Which contidor d
  18. iC trill appear that he is verr litele con-
  19. cernd in the greatest part ot this dispuce.
  20. ButC BaII Only instance rro or threc places
  21. Parcicularly, a5 irhere he argues, ThaL
  22. Oniversal consent is not necessary to déclare
  23. a Principle to be Natural; for the sense
  24. of Mnsick, of Beamy; ot Order, and Pro-
  25. portion are Latural to Mankind, tho some
  26. Nen ace not at au affected withthem. FVn
  27. the POIVer of Reason, (says he) severat Passi-
  28. ons, etC. appear sooner in some than othersi and
  29. if vou allom these Pxinciples eo be Naturat,
  30. and Born with us, Fhaom not nhy you stiou a
  31. mate such ado abovt the mord Innate. If you
  32. allorr none at al, net these last mention d, nor
  33. so much as millins, or nillinsthis, or thatu
  34. thecontroversie will be chane d: and I desire
  35. to enon hat dea von canform of a Soul with.
  36. ont any POIeTS, or any Action. Nor here
  37. ic is plaim, chatby Natural Principles IS On.
  38. ly CaNE Povers OT Faculties OF tho Soul,
  39. trhich is a rery disterent sensetrom thatin
  40. rhich MT. Lock denies any Principles to DC
  41. inuate, cho he does noc dens chem +0 b0
  42. Nacural;

Cite

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 61. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0073?run=74