A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 61
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.86.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- Tn
- ane
- AEt.
- do
- 11
- Lar of Nature irhich Mr. Lock is no lets an
- adrocacefor thanhe, tho he denrs Innate
- Principles, Which leads me to a very ma-
- terial obserration, which is, that chrovoh-
- out this whole Discourse, the Remarker,
- uses indisterent IY, 25 Perms ot the Pame idc. P. 5.
- signitication, Law of Nature, Natural Con-
- Science Innate Principles, Innate Povers, and
- Natural Princples, Which all signitie rery dif-
- Ferent thinss;and of wrhichMr. Lock hason-
- 9. 13.
- IY denied Innate Principles: Which contidor d
- iC trill appear that he is verr litele con-
- cernd in the greatest part ot this dispuce.
- ButC BaII Only instance rro or threc places
- Parcicularly, a5 irhere he argues, ThaL
- Oniversal consent is not necessary to déclare
- a Principle to be Natural; for the sense
- of Mnsick, of Beamy; ot Order, and Pro-
- portion are Latural to Mankind, tho some
- Nen ace not at au affected withthem. FVn
- the POIVer of Reason, (says he) severat Passi-
- ons, etC. appear sooner in some than othersi and
- if vou allom these Pxinciples eo be Naturat,
- and Born with us, Fhaom not nhy you stiou a
- mate such ado abovt the mord Innate. If you
- allorr none at al, net these last mention d, nor
- so much as millins, or nillinsthis, or thatu
- thecontroversie will be chane d: and I desire
- to enon hat dea von canform of a Soul with.
- ont any POIeTS, or any Action. Nor here
- ic is plaim, chatby Natural Principles IS On.
- ly CaNE Povers OT Faculties OF tho Soul,
- trhich is a rery disterent sensetrom thatin
- rhich MT. Lock denies any Principles to DC
- inuate, cho he does noc dens chem +0 b0
- Nacural;
Cite
A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 61. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0073?run=74