Leibniz-Handschriften zur Mathematik LH 35, 9, 2, fol. 42v
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.96.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 41r); this page is its left half.
The machine reads it as
- peur
- jum conatus recedendi fiet ipses tagitsae (qualis Gd) duplam
- duplus, ut in nostra demonstratione de aestimatione
- cona Conatus centrifugi supra ostensum est. Ita ut
- revera hic discrimen faciendum sit inter mobile quod
- in arcum circuli AG ca cadit per angulum contactus
- seu per rectam 1A, et inter mobile quod in arcum
- AG incidit per alium arcum EA, circuli ejusdem
- quod sane notabile est. Sed cum recedendi conatus
- ab angulo contactus ortus non nisi momentanens
- sit, alter vero durante circulatione locum habeat
- hujus si solius in usu et applicatione ratio haberi
- debet. idumque est licet inter (irculandum radius circulationis
- continue mutetur. potest enim motus compositus
- intelligi ex circulatione continuata incir Circulo
- priore, et progressu rectilineo mobilis in racho.
- in
Cite
Leibniz-Handschriften zur Mathematik LH 35, 9, 2, fol. 42v. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 73). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068126:0084?run=73