Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 20, fol. 389v
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.89.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- 3 The Nod Sensory, does not properly signifys the ergan,
- 66.
- but the Place of sensation. The Cye, the Car et, dre Organs, sout not
- Sensoria. Desides: Sr Hauc Nenton does not say, that space
- is the sensori; bat that it is, by Way of similitude only, as il Nere
- the sensory et.
- C4. At Was never supposed thatthe Tresence olthe Toul
- e
- V.
- Was sufficient, but onty. that et is mecersary, in order to Perception
- Nithout benu present to me mages os he things perciered, it
- could not possibly perciere them; but beinu present, is not
- sufficient, Wihont it be also a Livinu Substance anus imanimate
- substance, though present, percieves nohing; d a livinque dub=
- stance can ouly There percieve, Waere it is present either to
- Mhe Things Themselves Cas the Crimpresent Eod is tothe Whole
- umverse; ) orto the mages of hings, (as the soul ol MMlanis
- inils proper sensory.) Nothinu can any more act or be acted
- G
- 12s
- upon, here il is not present; than it ean De, Phere il s net.
- The souls beinu indivisible, does not prove it tobe present
- only m a mere soint. Space, finite orinfinite, is absolutelys
- indivisible, even so muimas in Thongnt; (To imagne ils parts
- moved trom each oher, is to imagime them moved out ol them-
- selves;) itud yet space isnot a mere dont
- Sod percieves things, not indeed by his simple Tresence
- tothem, nor yet by nis operation upon mem; but bus his vemus
- a Living et intelligent, as Wellas an Ommpresent substance.
- The doul lifetsise (: Nithin its narror sphere;) not by its
- 19.
- smple Trefence, bul by its beinus a Lrvinq substance, percieve
- s
- the mages o Nich it is present, et Wun Without bemus present
- tothem it could not percreve.
- Cb. et 7. Lis verus True, that the Excellency ot hods
- Norkmanship, doet ne Consus po
- bat in its Montnus he Nitdo of lod appears, not in matinus
Cite
Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 20, fol. 389v. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068378:0782?run=74