Leibniz Legible

Machine transcription of the Leibniz Nachlass

Search the Nachlass

Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 20, fol. 394r

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.83.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. jose
  2. s
  3. pentus
  4. ite
  5. pate
  6. et
  7. illis
  8. recause
  9. fed,
  10. at
  11. hon
  12. se
  13. huld
  14. ys
  15. upor
  16. ut
  17. not
  18. itiet.
  19. form
  20. ed
  21. osinue
  22. intra
  23. ldbe
  24. ather
  25. 40
  26. etare
  27. 7 et 8 Where there is Any disserence in the nature ol Things, there Me
  28. Consideration os that Diference alWays cletermines an Intelligent et persectly
  29. sise Agent. Dut Dhen Ao Ways of acting, are equally et alisse quod (:as
  30. in the instances beforementioned:) toaffirm in suih case, that hod cannot
  31. s
  32. aet at all, or thattis no perfection in him to be alle to art, because re
  33. can have no external Reuson lo move him to act one Way rather than
  34. theomer seems fo be a denymuse Eod to have in himselt any originat
  35. si
  36. needs
  37. frinciple or Soller of Degmning to act, but mat he must ullos
  38. Cas it Vere mechamcally) be altays determined by tuings extrinsick
  39. 9. suppose, that determinate Lvantilas os Matter thatis nov in the
  40. Mored es the most copvenient for me present trame os Nature, or the
  41. so
  42. present state ol Things: Ano thata Treater (as Wellas a, (ess) Qvantitus
  43. ol Matter, Mouldhave made the present frame ut the World les convenient;
  44. et consequently Nould not have been a greater object for Eod to have
  45. exercised his Lodnesi upon.
  46. s
  47. 10. The vestron 2s not, What loclenius, but Whar S Paaci Nentor
  48. 1.
  49. s
  50. means by the Nord Sensorium, When the debate is about the sense ol s
  51. Paac Nettons, et not about the sense of Joclenuss B0ok. D Gocleniu
  52. tas et meEge or Car oxong other Organ ol sensation, to be the sensorina
  53. heis certainly mistaten. Dut When Any Writer expressly explans
  54. Nhat he means by anu term os dnt; ot Weat use is it in this case, to
  55. inguire in Phat different senses perhaps some other Vriters have sometime
  56. et used the same ord: Scapula explains it by domicilium, the place
  57. 11. The soul ol à Dlind Man does for this reason not see, becanse
  58. Where the Mino resides.
  59. No mages are conveged tore bemu some obstruction in the Way) tothe
  60. sensorium Where the soul is present. Hon the soul ol a seing Man sees
  61. the mages Ao Which itis present, We RnoW not. Dut Weare sure it cannot
  62. percieve Whatitis not present toi because nommus can act, or be acted
  63. apon, Nhereit is not.
  64. 12. God, beina omnipresent, is really present to everythinus, essentiallus
  65. et substantiallus: His Trelence manifests itsels indeed by ils operation, bat
  66. s
  67. D.
  68. it could aot operale yf it Das nol There. The soul is not omnipresent
  69. p
  70. to every part osthe Lody, et perefore doet not, et cannor itsesactuallys
  71. operale lupon every part oftle Dody, but only upon che Dram or certain

Cite

Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 20, fol. 394r. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068378:0791?run=74