Search the Nachlass

The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance, fol. 14

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. 4
  2. por in him that siveth isse tvice, to sivethe same miseries tnico
  3. also. Andehus much in Ansiver to the Inconveniences that are
  4. pretended to folloro the Doctrine of Necessity.
  5. Onthe other side from ihis Position, thata man is free to mill.
  6. it follomeththat the Praescienceof God is quite tabem avay. For
  7. hor can it be lenoron beforetsand ihat mansall have a will to.
  8. ifthat rill of hisproceed not from necessary causes, but that he
  9. have in his porver to will ornot will: So also those thines hichs
  10. are called future continsents, is they come not ro passe rithcer-
  11. tainty, that is to Cay. Fromnecessary causes, can never be fore-
  12. nonn: so that Gods firelenomine san sometimes be of ihines that
  13. Ball not ceme to passe, rhich is as much to say, that his fore-
  14. tenomledse is none; hichis a great distentur to the AIl. lenom-
  15. Ene Porver.
  16. Thonch this be altthe Juconvenient Doctrine that folloverh.
  17. Freewill for as much as Tcan nom remeriber; pet tbe defend-
  18. inc of ehis opinion hach drarn the Pistop and other Patrons of
  19. et intomans inconvenient aud absurd conclusions, and made them
  20. make use of an infinite number of Insignificant vords; here-
  21. of one conclusion is in Suarez, that G0d doth soconcurre mith ihe
  22. rillof Man that it Manwill, etien Godconcurres; whicb
  23. is to subject not ihe will of Nan 10C0d, but the will ef God10
  24. Man. Otberinconvenient cnclusions L Pall then marte out
  25. ahen Tcometo my obsorvations upon the Bistops reply. And
  26. thus farre concernins the inconveniences that follom botb. Opi
  27. nions.
  28. The Aetribure of G0d which he drameth into areument is his
  29. Jactice, as that Ced cannos be zust in punistiine any man for
  30. that wbich he mas necessetatedro do. Fonhich L have ansvered
  31. before, as beine one of the Inconveniences pretendedro folion
  32. apon the Doctrinoos Necessiry. Onthe Contrary, from ano-
  33. oberof Gods Attribures, hich is his Fore-hnomledoe,
  34. Palevidently derive, that all Actions whatsoever. Whether
  35. they procced fromthe mill or from fortune vere necessary from
  36. eternity. For hatsoever God Fore lnometh sall eome to passe;
  37. connot but come ropasse, that is, itis impossible it sould not come
  38. eo passe, or othermise conse ro passe then il mas fore. lnonn.
  39. But hatsoever as Impossible sould be otherrise, vas ne-
  40. 6e sary 3

Cite

The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance, fol. 14. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0026?run=74