The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance, fol. 77
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.79.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- celhelu
- C, pei
- Mlle,
- Phereie
- CO com
- mmende
- bac, V1
- hache
- V aICnO
- 10d8 Ch
- pale bnt
- lECMarC
- vesertro
- adres
- ite, did
- ut alvat
- pand a I
- njust
- 15 noII
- THIEIBI
- juttit
- GranB)
- chotH
- oreereil
- oalHet 1
- 2
- argument al(o. He telsus, ehac he wasnocsuopriled. WVI e
- cher he wece or nOF, is more chanL know. Bucchis Llcc
- plainly, chaceicher heisnocprorided, orthachis caule ad-
- mies no chorce oFamvers. The seus dealeingenousy when
- elies met wich a difficule knoc, Wtich ches couldnocuncie,
- EO PRLICMPOn Elius. F.. 12S Will ansver it when he comes.
- Animadvertions iipon che Bishops R eply
- etumb. A.
- HF Bistrop argued thus. Thirdly, il chere BenO crve
- liberer, buc allehinss comero pals by incricable necel.
- Cicy, chen whaca:e as chosc incerrosations we find (0 fre-
- quenels in holy Scripeures, (be ic spoten wich all dueret-
- Pect) buc faisned and hyprcritical exasgerarions d Flere
- puttins tocether trorepuenant suppositions cithererafrily or (be
- it spolen mith al due respect) ienoranily. he ronld have men
- beleeve that L becanse Lbold Necessity. I deny Liberty. L
- hold as muchthat there is true Liberty, as hedoth, and more.
- for Thold it as from Necessity; and thatthere must of Neces-
- siry be Liberty, but heholds it nocfrom Necessity, and so makes
- it pessible there maybenone. His expostulations vere, First,
- Hast chou eacen ofehe eree whereot Icommoned cheechae
- chou Mouldest noc eard Sccondly. Why hast chou done chis :
- Thiraly. Wrhyare chouweoch, and hy is chy COHCenANCC
- east doun d Fourchly. Why willve dyc O houle oF. IIraeld
- Phese Areuments requirine the same ansiver which some o-
- ther do, Lthouphe fit toremit them toiheir fellomes. But the
- BimoD will not allor me that. Por he (aith,
- a Cercainly saith he distinet Areumenes, as chechird and
- tilchare, esc. did require distinct anserS.
- Jam therefore tosive an acconnt ofthe meanins of the afore-
- said objnrcarions and expostulations: Nst of rhe end for mhich
- God Sard Hlast chouearen ot therree _C. but hom ibose mords
- may be calen mithont repugnanceto the doctrine of N’ecessity.
- These mords Has choueacen oFcherrec Whereos ( command.
- ed chac chou Moudest nOeaF. Convince Adam that noE-
- vith.
Cite
The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance, fol. 77. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0089?run=74